辩题：vs 　　环节：自由辩论

　　正方：Twenty one are you study.（此句语义不明，可能为“Are you twenty - one?”）I heard that you already have said that you don't think you should have strangeness（此处原词“strange”为形容词，推测应为名词“strangeness”） because it may cause trouble to yourself. But I want to say that it is a serious cause. There are several examples. It means if there are so many situations, they ask you, you can't miss it because it is very bad. But it's just one of all the examples. We cannot ignore this. This is not very special. So I think the logic is reasonable. But the bias you have said actually exists and we can never ignore it. Maybe we have heard of it before ourselves. Because if one hundred people have one hundred different strangers and one of them gets hurt, it cannot be ignored. Because you will never know when you will be the one who gets hurt. And once I know an example, just as in the first debate she said, if somebody asks you how to get to some place, for example, a girl, a stranger, and she leads him to the place, the street. Let's go. But then, the man just kidnaps her and in the end he kills the girl. This example shows that this girl is killed because of her empathy. She wants to help the stranger but she gets killed. This cannot be ignored. As I said, you can never know whether you are the person who gets injured or not. If you never know whether your help will injure yourself, then how should you know whether you should help or not? The two sides won't lead to the same result. If you said the girl helped the man, so she got kidnapped. But if the girl didn't help the man, the man wouldn't use other ways to kidnap the girl. The way the man kidnapped the girl was because the girl led him to a place and this place was where the man wanted to go. Maybe there was no camera, maybe nobody would find her, so she got kidnapped. That's really a kind of help. Because we have common sense, we can determine the way to help others. And we can detect the cheat if the cheat is so obvious. And they ask me how to tell the threat. Because the girl is, um, may be strong, and we have common sense that we girls are weak so we shouldn't help the man this way. But maybe we can help him in another way. We can show him the map. Why shouldn't we do that but instead lead him to the place? If it's not a man but a pregnant woman and she couldn't work. She asks you to help her go home. What will you do? And we can never know. What I hope is that we can go back to our original point. Because we are talking about we should help others but not how to judge whether it is good or not. Just like you just said that one hundred people, only one is hurt, so you think we shouldn't help. But I just want to ask, when you eat food, you can get choking. Then it's just like you think we shouldn't eat this food. But it's not the same. If you don't eat, you will die. But if you don't help others, you will never improve. If you don't have others, you said nothing. OK, if you don't help other people, that won't bring anything to you. But if you help other people, that may bring you damage. OK, for example, you can take a car or an airplane. The airplane and the car are always may be in danger. So you do so that you read（此句语义不明）, you never take a car, you will always take the airplane. Everybody should choose a way with the least risk. For example, if I want to cross the Yangtze River, I will choose to maybe take a boat. Okay, but I will never swim across the river. That's the way I choose. It has the lower risk. And for helping other people, I won't help him because this is with the lower risk. I help him and that maybe suddenly bring me danger and that's not what I want.

　　反方：You are based on the conception that strangers are uncertain. But let's take a different view. If you think a stranger is uncertain and comical（此处“comedylid”可能为拼写错误，推测为“comical”，但语义仍不太明确）, then when you are in trouble, a stranger offers to help you, you wouldn't choose to accept his help. OK, in prior laws and regulations, there are more proper channels and institutions to cope with my difficulties. OK, so what does “should” really mean according to the English dictionary? It is used to show what is right. If people are friends, for not helping others, we are dutiful. For example, not all your senior high school classmates whose grades are worse than you get your help. Are you the first to help others? Is helping others helping ourselves? I don't think that's correct. Because helping others won't bring anything. It's just our personal mental state. But if you want to see the possibility, it's very low.

　　正方一辩·开篇陈词：

　　我方很荣幸开启我方对于此辩题的论述。我们认为，在这个联系日益紧密的世界里，是否应该向陌生人伸出援手不仅仅是一个道德困境，更是我们共有人性的一种反映。我方坚信，当陌生人需要帮助时，在确保自身安全的前提下，我们应该展现出同理心。或者说，在我们能力范围内提供帮助。接下来我将提出三个有说服力的论点来支持我方观点。

　　首先，帮助陌生人会对他们的生活产生深远影响。有时候，一个小小的善举就能带来巨大的改变，无论是帮助迷路的人找到方向，还是帮掉落物品的人捡起东西，这些行为都能立即给人带来慰藉，让他人的一天变得更好。而且，这些行为会产生连锁反应，激励其他人将善意传递下去，从而营造一种友善的文化氛围。

　　其次，帮助陌生人有助于个人同理心的培养和自身成长。一方面，帮助他人能给我们带来一种满足感和成就感；另一方面，与我们直接社交圈子之外的人交往会挑战我们的观念，促使我们从不同的视角看待世界。此外，帮助他人其实就是在帮助自己，当世界上每个人都愿意帮助陌生人时，你给予他人的善意最终也会回报到自己身上。

　　最后，帮助陌生人能促进社区意识和社会凝聚力的形成。对陌生人的善举能够打破隔阂、建立信任，这对于一个和谐且正常运转的社会来说是必不可少的。作为年轻一代，我们应该承担起为社会福祉做出贡献、互相帮助的责任。

　　谢谢。

　　Respect each other, dear audience. Good morning, everyone.

　　We hold the opinion that we should not help strangers first.

　　First and foremost, we may have to sacrifice our own interests. Not helping strangers may help save ourselves. Helping strangers can give us a moral sense of satisfaction, but we are obviously more likely to get into trouble. Some people will take advantage of the kindness of strangers to cheat. As a result, we may fall into their traps and have to pay the price. For example, personal information may be blackmailed in traffic, etc. Statistically speaking, the probability of us encountering fraud is much higher than the probability of receiving a return. Therefore, helping strangers has negative benefits for individuals as a whole.

　　Moreover, helping strangers may even endanger our lives. For example, we all know that a police officer tried to save a woman who wanted to commit suicide by jumping into the river, but the woman just refused this help and pushed his head into the water, making him drown.

　　Apart from what has been mentioned above, it is almost impossible for us to judge whether a stranger is good or evil in such a short time. Even if he is really in trouble, it is also difficult for us to judge what the cause of his difficulties is and the reasons for his illegal behavior. If the cost is high, then our help to him is undoubtedly adding harm. So it will cause potential harm to social stability.

　　Last but not least, different people may react differently to strangers' help. We may probably hear other people's spread of wrong information. Our sloppy help in some medical conditions may even exaggerate the patient's condition, which usually causes even more trouble to him.

　　Considering all the reasons above, we think we should not help strangers.

　　辩题为：AI生成当陌生人需要帮助时，在确保自身安全的前提下应该向其伸出援手vsAI生成不应该首先向陌生人伸出援手 　　环节为：自由辩论

　　正方： 　　If you have something else to say you can go ahead another three visit OK uh and then after you finish your three debate you can come to the you need three more minutes yes。首先，社会是由陌生人组成的（Society mostly made of strangers）。如果说没有陌生人之间的互助，只靠亲属间的互助是不够的。当有人处于危险中，比如着火了，会呼叫消防员；孩子遇到危险会呼叫警察，这就是社会救助的方式。消防员和警察的力量是他们的职责所在，而社会的信任和善意才是社会得以建立的基础。如果拒绝帮助陌生人，就是在伤害这种信任和善意，也就是在伤害我们成功的基石。

　　反方： 　　我想反驳正方的假设，说没有消防员和警察是不正确的，因为现实中有消防员和警察。而且我们所说的帮助是指直接帮助，像正方提到的一些间接帮助，比如厨师做饭获得工资这种，不应该被考虑在我们辩论的帮助范围内。正方认为帮助只有直接帮助这一种理解方式，这是片面的。另外，正方说帮助他人是同理心的体现，但有时候帮助他人可能会损害自己的利益，比如有人找你要钱你给了，这就是损害自己利益的一种表现。从数学期望来说，如果帮助别人，最终的期望可能是负的。

　　正方： 　　当我们看到小孩有危险，我们打电话给警察或者消防员，这也是一种帮助，帮助可以分为直接帮助和间接帮助。而且今天我们的话题是帮助陌生人，不是帮助亲属和朋友，因为对于陌生人我们并不了解，有时候我们以为的帮助可能会让对方陷入尴尬的境地，比如一个身体强壮的老人在公交车上，你给他让座，可能会让他感到不自在。

　　反方： 　　如果我们每次遇到困难就习惯性地寻求帮助，我们将永远不会进步，我们应该提高自己的能力，如果没有人帮助我，我会努力自我提升，这是现实。而且我们不能以貌取人，永远不知道一个人是好是坏。

　　Back in the judges and dear audience, today we are discussing the topic of whether we should help strangers. We hold the negative view. Firstly, helping strangers also means sacrificing many of our precious resources. It could be the limited time we have after work or study, our hard - earned energy, or even our money, health, and even life. In the cases of those who lost their lives while rescuing strangers, the stories are indeed touching, but behind them are the unbearable pains of their families. We cannot overlook these potential huge costs. After all, everyone's life and livelihood are equally precious and worthy of respect.

　　We admit that helping others is a virtue, but virtue is not an obligation. In reality, things are limited. Blindly helping strangers may ignore our own resources and affect our responsibilities towards our families. Because different people have different understandings of the limits of helping others, so it's not a universal obligation. Some strangers may turn out to be swindlers. Helping them will encourage such bad habits. Take professional beggars for example. It will instead undermine social fairness and order.

　　Secondly, taking actions without knowing the real situation is extremely risky. If the stranger has ulterior motives, our good intentions might be exploited and become an aid to their evils. Just like some frauds taking advantage of passers - by's kindness for illegal activities, which not only harms individuals but also poses potential threats to the entire social security and trust system. We cannot act impulsively without considering the possible serious consequences.

　　However, even without malicious intention, rushing to help strangers might backfire. Without all professional knowledge and skill reserves, acting haphazardly is likely to make things worse. For example, finally, giving first aid without relevant knowledge might aggravate the patient's condition.

　　Therefore, we advocate that we should not directly help strangers. Instead, we should first ensure our own safety and then look for professionals or institutions that are capable of providing appropriate help for them. This is not indifference, but a more mature, rational, and effective form of kindness. This kind of kindness can not only avoid unnecessary risks and losses but also truly and practically provide suitable assistance to those in need. Let us interpret kindness in a wise way instead of acting blindly and impulsively. Thank you.

　　Judges, friends, today we are here to debate on the topic. We firmly believe that in this debate, we should help strangers under the premise of ensuring our own safety. I will present our arguments again as follows.

　　Help refers to the right kind of assistance which comes from self - awareness and the ability to distinguish. It doesn't mean offering help unconditionally in any situation, such as in the face of developing criminality. The world's truth is that thoughts and actions are directed by attitude.

　　Firstly, helping others can have a profound and positive impact on them. It can help people in times of need, like offering food to the hungry or shelter to the homeless, which relieves their physical distress. Moreover, emotional support, like being a listening ear during a difficult time, can sometimes be moral support and help them gain confidence. Helping might inspire individuals to pay it forward, creating a ripple effect of kindness and generosity in society. It can also change their perspective on life, making them more optimistic and willing to trust in the goodness of humanity.

　　Secondly, helping is an essential part of building a harmonious and friendly society. When we offer help in time to those in need, regardless of whether they are familiar to us or not, we are providing companionship and warmth. Simple acts of helping, such as giving directions to a lost traveler, or assisting an elderly person with a heavy load, can make a significant impact on their lives. It not only solves the immediate problems but also gives a sense of security to society.

　　Furthermore, helping others is a manifestation of our moral and ethical values. It requires humanity and compassion. The act of helping others can bring out a sense of humaneness and satisfaction that cannot be measured by material things. Against potential risks, we can become better individuals by reaching out to strangers and making a positive difference in their lives. We argue that although helping may sometimes involve risks, we cannot let the fear of potential risks overshadow the goodness in our hearts. We can take appropriate precautions and use our judgment to ensure our safety while still offering help.

　　In conclusion, helping is a noble and necessary behavior. It enriches our society and enhances ourselves. Let us not hesitate to extend our companionship and assistance to strangers, for it is through these small acts that we can create a beautiful and loving world. Thank you.