necessary

not necessary

　　好的，各位，我们现在开始共享屏幕。

　　OK，可以看到吗？可以看到吗？

　　OK，OK，OK。

　　你是说直接开始吗？我们说好321开始。

　　大家好，我认为手机对中学生是必要的。手机对我们来说是有帮助的辅助工具。

　　接下来，我将从三个方面论证我的观点。第一，手机是获取信息的便捷途径。我们可以通过手机快速查阅学习资料、了解时事新闻，这对我们的知识积累和视野拓展非常重要。

　　第二，手机有助于保持与家人和朋友的联系。在遇到困难或需要帮助时，手机可以让我们及时与家人沟通，也能方便地与朋友交流学习心得和生活琐事，增进彼此的感情。

　　第三，手机在学习和生活中能提供很多便利。比如，使用学习类APP可以辅助我们学习，导航软件能帮助我们找到目的地，在线支付也让生活更加便捷。

　　因此，我坚信手机对中学生是必要的，它能为我们的学习和生活带来诸多益处。

　　谢谢大家。

　　Most middle school students have this great because they can show proper study methods sometimes. They can look for the right answers and ask classmates, but it can be problematic to understand, and even so. This cost making things unable to solve problems either, so we have the mobile phone, which has a positive price. Such as artificial intelligence, you really can use it to help understand. Yeah, yeah, I agree with you. Uh, I don't agree with you because, but in the past, some students didn't have mobile phones, but they could still get into high schools or great colleges. A great college student is great, and I think the mobile phone is harmful to students. It started because some students stay up late to play games or watch videos, so they can't have a good rest. They will feel tired the next day, can't focus on class, and it's bad for their eyes. I know your point, but I don't agree. Some students don't have self-discipline, so they don't focus on study because they get distracted. They don't want to focus because they're thinking about something else. So I think the phone isn't the reason. I know the phone will have an impact on us, but it depends on ourselves, it depends on us. Yeah, I agree with you. It doesn't depend on the student, it even doesn't depend on the mobile phone. But middle school students are too young, they can't protect themselves and can't control themselves well. Even some students don't have self-control, so that's why some have internet addiction, any addiction for minors, and some schools prohibit mobile phones in class. As I mentioned, maybe we just need to realize that everything will be fine without misuse, but if we use it as a tool, we can improve our learning. If we misuse it, it will bring us harm.

　　If you think it just a tool, mobile phone is everything, then you can say OK. If you didn't hear me, I didn't finish, just a try to interrupt me. I should have interrupted directly. Yeah, you can interrupt me directly. If you don't interrupt me, I can continue. You should interrupt me when you hear key words. But sometimes, you know, when you just said it last time, I thought you didn't finish, and I was a bit不好意思, so I didn't interrupt. You should have interrupted directly. OK, OK, let's recover.

　　If you think it's just a tool, you don't need to only use the mobile phone. You can ask your teacher, ask your classmate, or go to the library. All these can help you solve problems. So if you need to solve problems, if you see just a try, I think you mean it can be replaced, but it's not necessary, right? Just mentioned, and it can go back. As I have mentioned, as for teachers, they are only one, but there are more students, so students can't all get the right answers for themselves. They need to spend more time on study. Yeah, yeah, I agree with you. But the mobile phone really brings convenience to help students improve their scores, but I think the mobile phones have disagreements. If without mobile phones, some students just can't get help, but some students are addicted to them and are too young.

　　Why did this time have 30 seconds? I don't remember we just finished speaking. I don't know, because I... That's so weird. Maybe we were too smooth? Then let's do it again, read the middle part more. OK, last time, then we'll go through the ending and move to the next link.

　　Hello everyone, this is Maple. My opinion is clear: mobile phones are not necessary for middle school students. Some might say we can't live without them, but we still can study, share, and communicate without a mobile phone, right? And mobile phones are harmful to students—like distraction, poor health, and even addiction. That's why I think it's unnecessary for middle school students.

　　I want to start by discussing whether mobile phones are necessary for middle school students. On one hand, mobile phones can bring convenience, such as allowing students to quickly look up answers, access educational resources, and communicate with teachers and classmates. However, this convenience does not mean necessity. On the other hand, mobile phones also bring significant harms, including distraction from studies, negative impacts on physical health (like eye strain and poor sleep due to staying up late to play games or watch short videos), and the risk of addiction, especially for young students who lack self-control.

　　Some might argue that without mobile phones, students still achieve high scores, as past generations did well in school without them. But the issue is not just about high scores; it's about effective learning and self-discipline. While mobile phones have useful apps, their value depends on how they are used. Middle school students are still in the process of forming habits and self-control, making them vulnerable to the negative effects of mobile phone addiction. Schools often prohibit mobile phones in class to prevent distractions, and students can always ask teachers or classmates for help instead of relying on phones for quick answers.

　　In conclusion, the potential harms of mobile phones for middle school students outweigh their benefits. Given their age and lack of self-control, it's better to avoid mobile phones to ensure they focus on studies and develop healthy habits for the future.

　　I think we need to be more mindful of not interrupting each other. It's better to let the other person finish their point before responding. Let's start with the first round, giving each side time to present their views.

　　Most people don't achieve good grades because they are not focused on their studies. They can look for answers online, but this might affect their ability to think independently. Artificial intelligence tools can help, but they should be used as a supplement, not a replacement for genuine learning. Without proper self-discipline, students might rely too much on mobile phones, leading to distraction and poor academic performance.

　　I disagree with the previous point. Mobile phones are not the root cause of poor grades; the issue is self-control. In the past, students succeeded without mobile phones, and today, with them, some still excel by using them for educational purposes. The key is how we use technology. If students use mobile phones responsibly, they can enhance their learning efficiency.

　　Middle school students are too young to control themselves. Some schools prohibit mobile phones to prevent addiction, and even with self-control, it's hard to resist the temptation of games and social media. While mobile phones can be useful, the risks of distraction and addiction make them unnecessary for middle school students. We should encourage them to use other resources, like teachers and libraries, to solve problems.

　　I agree that self-control is important, but the responsibility also lies with the education system and parents. If students are taught to manage their time and use technology wisely, mobile phones can be beneficial. The problem is not the device itself, but how it's integrated into daily life. As long as we balance its use, mobile phones can be a helpful tool for learning, not a necessity or a threat.

　　Actually, I think the key is that the necessity of mobile phones for middle school students depends on their ability to use them responsibly. Since many students lack self-discipline, it's safer to limit or avoid mobile phones in the classroom. The goal is to help them develop good study habits and focus, which is more important than having access to technology.

　　I think we should consider both sides. While there are risks, there are also benefits. The debate should focus on whether the benefits justify the risks for middle school students. Given their age, the potential harms are too significant, so mobile phones are not necessary.

　　Let's reset and start over. First, each side will present their opening arguments clearly and not interrupt. I think we're doing well, but let's make sure to give each other enough time to speak.

　　For evening everyone, I want to emphasize that mobile phones are not necessary for middle school students. They should focus on traditional methods of learning, and the benefits of mobile phones are outweighed by their risks. I look forward to the debate and hope we can have a constructive discussion.

　　Mobile phones are necessary for students and are not necessary, okay.

　　I wonder to tell you at a time I heard that for our primary or middle school students, mobile phones can be helpful assistance. This point is to demonstrate why my stance is very correct, and I look forward to defenses in the following debate. Thank you.

　　But I don't agree with you. You see, some students can't get high scores because they don't have mobile phones. But in the past, when people didn't have mobile phones, some students still could get high scores or enter great colleges and high schools. I think mobile phones harm students' study because some students believe they can get good grades by playing games or watching videos late, which makes them tired the next day, unable to focus in class, and also bad for their health.

　　I see your point, but I don't completely agree. Some people might not have all the necessary conditions now, but they don't want to study because of reasons unrelated to form. They get distracted easily, thinking about other things. I know mobile phones have many bad effects on our study and health, but it doesn't depend on the division itself; it depends on the user. What really matters is how we use it.

　　Yeah, I agree it doesn't depend on mobile phones, but on the user. However, middle school students are too young to control themselves in using mobile phones properly. That's why some apps set up addiction engines for minors, and some schools prohibit mobile phones in class.

　　I mentioned earlier that if you use mobile phones in a right way, it can improve our study and bring more benefits. You can try to solve problems by asking teachers, classmates, or going to the library. Mobile phones can make students study efficiently, but the disadvantages outweigh the advantages for some students. Some students can get high scores, but others are attracted by mobile phones, which might be bad for their future.

　　Everything has two sides, and mobile phones are good things to help students improve their study. The key is whether we can use them properly.

　　It is a point. In the second round, when you said "it just...", I think I could interrupt you in the first sentence, which would allow more time for impromptu discussions. The last sentence you said, about students' mission being study and scores, is interesting. I would counter that— is that really education?

　　If we can interrupt in the first sentence, we can have more time to discuss such viewpoints. Let's try again. Maybe it's better to have Pan Gui look at it? It's okay, being messy is real.

　　He's coming. He's coming. Let's record a video. Okay, reset, 3, 2, 1. So, evening, I wonder to tell you at a time I heard that for our primary or middle school students, mobile phones can be helpful assistance. This point is to demonstrate why my stance is very correct, and I look forward to defenses in the following debate. Thank you.

　　Most middle school students don't have a great good way. Of course they can solve problems by asking classmates or looking for right answers, but they can't promise they can understand. Even if classmates can't solve problems easily, we have mobile phone help, which can solve problems in time.

　　For example, artificial intelligence is free and easy to help you.

　　Yeah, yeah. I don't agree with you because some students didn't get high scores because they don't have the mobile phone. But in the past, when people didn't have mobile phones, some students still got high scores and entered college.

　　However, I think mobile phones are harmful to students because some students lack self-discipline, leading to playing games or watching videos, which prevents them from getting a good rest. They will feel tired the next day, can't focus on class, and it's also harmful to their health.

　　I see your point, but I don't agree with you. Some people don't have mobile phones but still want to study and get good results. Mobile phones are just a tool; if you use them properly, you can solve problems by asking teachers, classmates, or going to the library. So mobile phones can be replaced if necessary.

　　You know, it just goes back to what I mentioned at first. Of course you can ask a teacher for help in class, but a teacher has to deal with more than working students. You can imagine a student waiting for another 39 students to solve problems because time is limited, and the course is so tight.

　　I agree that time is precious for students, but mobile phones can make study more efficient. However, I think the disadvantage outweighs the advantage. Some students who don't have mobile phones can still get high scores, but some students who have mobile phones may be addicted because they are too young to control themselves. This can lead to harm or bad habits, which will have a bad influence on their future, and it's difficult to change.

　　I agree with you. Mobile phone is a tool, and it depends on how you use it. Everything has pros and cons. If misused, it causes harm; if used properly, it can improve study. Not everyone can use mobile phones correctly. That's why some apps set restrictions for minors and some schools prohibit mobile phones in class—because students are too young to control themselves. That's real education.

　　I think the teaching job is strong, as we can help students solve problems in time. Of course, it has an impact on us, but it also depends on ourselves. If we use it widely, we can bring more benefits. Thank you.

　　And finally, I want to say although mobile phones can bring some convenience to students, the existence of convenience does not mean necessity. Yeah, and they also bring some harm, such as distraction, bad health, and even addiction. If something is unnecessary and harmful, how can we say it is necessary? Right, we can think about it.

　　好乱呀，讲乱了。好笑好笑。

　　你们两个整体还是很不错的。你们两个都很稳，然后，你们两个的第一否定词都很准确。就是在反驳对方的时候，你们都会要么认可，要么理解，要么不认可之类的，第一否定词很清晰。

　　然后美国的话。