[AI生成]

[AI生成]

　　According to UNESCO's definition of endangered languages, their danger ranges from only being used without being taught to children in the ethnic group, to being occasionally used only by the elders of the group. Therefore, they are on the verge of extinction.

　　I want to question that although these languages contain ancient knowledge that is useful for solving certain problems, I believe that if we invest money to study and preserve these old knowledge, it will not achieve long-term renewal. It can only last for a short period of time. But we know that technology and culture are innovating and developing, especially in an exponential trend. I am not sure whether renewing these languages can last for a long period of time.

　　I believe we should prioritize modern technology and science, because what Jess has said might be true—some languages do contain such knowledge. However, these endangered languages carrying traditional knowledge are usually out of date and need to be renewed. If we spend extra costs renewing them, I think those resources could be better invested in more important areas like modern technology.

　　Traditional knowledge may be useful, but it can only last for 10 to 50 years. What about 100 years or even longer? The core problem is still focusing on learning advanced technology, not just clinging to outdated traditions. Thank you.

　　你所提供的原始文本存在较多语义不通、逻辑混乱的内容，且部分表述可能存在语音转写错误，无法准确还原其原本的发言意图，因此无法按照要求进行优化处理。建议你提供清晰准确的原始对话文本，以便我为你完成校对工作。

　　首先需要说明，原始文本存在较多语法、拼写错误以及语义不通顺的地方，以下是按照要求优化后的内容：

　　对方此前的核心观点是，所有语言都已不再被使用，且保护这些语言成本高昂。对此我的反驳是，语言正在不断更新，同时也能带来并催生新的知识。

　　再以语言为例，全球900余种特有植物相关的独特知识，至今仍被用于优化更多治疗方案。此外，针对这些语言的独特对等术语，也在帮助我们开展逆向研究。

　　即便有人认为这些语言对现实生活毫无价值，仍有环境研究者持续将它们应用于自身的研究工作中。

　　等我改一下时间啊。

　　Not just cultural artifacts but also language systems including unique knowledge. Languages like Colognian and Colombian languages are not something we could merely preserve in books or archives. We should instead speak them, protect them, and pass them on. Through these languages, knowledge can be transmitted to community members, and these languages and the villages that carry them can also bring benefits to modern society.

　　Losing these languages is not just about losing words, but also about losing the protection of these languages themselves. We are also losing a vital part of our cultural heritage.

　　等一下啊。Let me the time, OK? And technology and by. By how the society, social systems work systems, works and we know that productivity shapes like, changes society greatly and therefore I still tend to believe that in the aspect of knowledge of technology has a more broader and a prolonged view of, a prolonged effect of human society and like knowledge and things like cultural culture, but and I want to add that the EU in 2020 made a plan called horizon 2020 which cost them like four, five hundred dollars, million, but the Canada's program of saving native languages cost, it cost 1 billion us dollars.

　　And these two things are both important, but I still tend these two things are both important, but I still tend to believe that technology is more cheaper and it's more valuable. We cannot put price on knowledge and you cannot estimate the cost of preserving, preserving the knowledge are expensive than losing the unique knowledge break.