例如,《在恋爱关系中,应该追求等价的付出·在恋爱关系中,不应该追求等价的付出》一题,辩之竹内共收录26场比赛。我们为您提供这26场比赛的论点、判断标准提取,以及总计数百条论据的提取,还有Deepseek的辩题分析。这可以帮您更好备赛。
欢迎您点击下方按钮,前往查看。
阅读量:0
我等会儿要跟大家讨论一个英语相关的内容,过程中可能会有一些声音,大概持续半小时。
人到齐了,我来介绍一下辩题。正方观点是“this house believes that hardship process is compulsory for college students”,反方观点是“not compulsory”。这是他们上周考试的题目,我把题目拿过来,咱们一起练习一下。
大家对题目有什么问题吗?没问题的话,先进行10分钟的准备时间,之后正方一辩、反方一辩开始发言。大家有问题吗?没有的话,我就直接开始计时了。
我们先各自搜索相关材料和概念,一辩要把“Ship courses”和“compulsory”的定义阐述清楚,“College students”则不需要特别定义。其他人找一下相关的论据和论点。3分钟后开始头脑风暴。
3分钟时间到了,首先请一辩分享。
二辩的观点和第一个同学重复了,可以换一个角度。如果我是反方,会强调精神压力可能过大,导致适得其反,比如学生可能会厌学、逃避学习。因为有些大学生本身就不爱学习,课程设置太难会让他们更不想学。另外,学生的自主选择权会被削弱,他们考上大学是为了有更多自由和选择权,强制设置课程会让他们觉得这不是真正的大学。你可以针对这两点进行反驳,因为正方肯定会认可“Ship”,但会强调学生有自主选择权。
还剩一分半,接下来是三辩发言。
还剩1分钟,一辩要做好定义,并阐述一些个人观点;二辩进行反驳,并完善个人观点;三辩继续反驳,并引入一些社会层面的观点。
还剩半分钟,大家把不认识的单词查一下,之后正式开始。有问题可以随时交流。
准备时间结束,现在由正方一辩进行阐述,计时开始。
我等会儿要跟大家讨论一个英语相关的内容,过程中可能会有一些声音,大概持续半小时。
人到齐了,我来介绍一下辩题。正方观点是“this house believes that hardship process is compulsory for college students”,反方观点是“not compulsory”。这是他们上周考试的题目,我把题目拿过来,咱们一起练习一下。
大家对题目有什么问题吗?没问题的话,先进行10分钟的准备时间,之后正方一辩、反方一辩开始发言。大家有问题吗?没有的话,我就直接开始计时了。
我们先各自搜索相关材料和概念,一辩要把“Ship courses”和“compulsory”的定义阐述清楚,“College students”则不需要特别定义。其他人找一下相关的论据和论点。3分钟后开始头脑风暴。
3分钟时间到了,首先请一辩分享。
二辩的观点和第一个同学重复了,可以换一个角度。如果我是反方,会强调精神压力可能过大,导致适得其反,比如学生可能会厌学、逃避学习。因为有些大学生本身就不爱学习,课程设置太难会让他们更不想学。另外,学生的自主选择权会被削弱,他们考上大学是为了有更多自由和选择权,强制设置课程会让他们觉得这不是真正的大学。你可以针对这两点进行反驳,因为正方肯定会认可“Ship”,但会强调学生有自主选择权。
还剩一分半,接下来是三辩发言。
还剩1分钟,一辩要做好定义,并阐述一些个人观点;二辩进行反驳,并完善个人观点;三辩继续反驳,并引入一些社会层面的观点。
还剩半分钟,大家把不认识的单词查一下,之后正式开始。有问题可以随时交流。
准备时间结束,现在由正方一辩进行阐述,计时开始。
正方一辩PM开篇陈词
这一个一辩结束,接下来由反方一辩开始。
辩题:thbt hardship courses is compulsory for college students vs thbt hardship courses is not compulsory for college students
正方一辩PM开篇陈词
这一个一辩结束,接下来由反方一辩开始。
辩题:thbt hardship courses is compulsory for college students vs thbt hardship courses is not compulsory for college students
好,准备好,计时开始。
时间到。
接下来来到我们的正方。
注:原文本中“正房”可能是“正方”的口误,按照修正同音错字的要求进行了修改。同时,由于没有更多关于发言内容的信息,仅根据现有文本进行了处理。
好,准备好,计时开始。
时间到。
接下来来到我们的正方。
注:原文本中“正房”可能是“正方”的口误,按照修正同音错字的要求进行了修改。同时,由于没有更多关于发言内容的信息,仅根据现有文本进行了处理。
Greetings to everyone present. Our motion is that hardship courses are compulsory for college students.
First of all, I want to refute one point. If the hardship courses are compulsory, some may think that the courses will be less diverse. However, different majors can have different compulsory hardship courses, and these can be designed by the teachers. We do not mean that everyone should take the same course.
After refuting this point, I'd like to say that today what we are really talking about is three questions. The first question is what kind of talents does society need? The second question is whether we can exert our full potential by ourselves without the compulsory courses. The third question is what is the real role that our college and the courses play in the world.
Regarding the first question, in today's world, there are many challenges and risks. We personally need more resilient people who can face failure and won't give up if they fall down. In the workplace, to meet the career demands, the hardship courses can help us prevent giving up and be more accepting of failure in our work.
As for the third question, we are people with a mentality of comfort and ease. If we want to get a high GPA without the hardship courses, maybe we are not going to choose the difficult ones and may tend to choose the easy ones. Without the compulsory hardship courses, we may just choose the easy ones and cannot discover all our potential. This is not what society really needs.
Thank you.
Greetings to everyone present. Our motion is that hardship courses are compulsory for college students.
First of all, I want to refute one point. If the hardship courses are compulsory, some may think that the courses will be less diverse. However, different majors can have different compulsory hardship courses, and these can be designed by the teachers. We do not mean that everyone should take the same course.
After refuting this point, I'd like to say that today what we are really talking about is three questions. The first question is what kind of talents does society need? The second question is whether we can exert our full potential by ourselves without the compulsory courses. The third question is what is the real role that our college and the courses play in the world.
Regarding the first question, in today's world, there are many challenges and risks. We personally need more resilient people who can face failure and won't give up if they fall down. In the workplace, to meet the career demands, the hardship courses can help us prevent giving up and be more accepting of failure in our work.
As for the third question, we are people with a mentality of comfort and ease. If we want to get a high GPA without the hardship courses, maybe we are not going to choose the difficult ones and may tend to choose the easy ones. Without the compulsory hardship courses, we may just choose the easy ones and cannot discover all our potential. This is not what society really needs.
Thank you.