[AI生成]电子阅读可以取代纸质阅读

[AI生成]电子阅读不能取代纸质阅读

　　正方一辩： 　　Today our topic is paper reading will not be replaced by e-reading. And today, if we prove the uniqueness of paper reading, then we will succeed in our debate.

　　The first reason is that we can have the tactile field, which is a physical interaction. For example, we can touch our books. We can have a sense of turning every page of the books, and we can feel the weight of the books. Also, we can smell the fragrance of the books, which can give us an overwhelming pressure that cannot be replicated by e-reading.

　　The second point is that it can increase our comprehensive understanding and concentration. Because if you have the feeling of the books, you can be more concentrated on the books. However, you cannot be disrupted by the notifications popping out from your WeChat.

　　反方一辩： 　　Hey guys, we think paper reading will be replaced by e-reading. We have three reasons. First one is portability and large storage. Second one is interactivity. And last one is environmental protection and health. People use e - reading...

　　We just mentioned that people will like the physical interaction. Actually, there's evidence that when young people use e - readers for reading, they can also enjoy the reading. Now, there are many applications which provide many features like note - taking abilities, discussion forums, animated illustrations, and some effects. The various multimedia and multi - sensory features in e - reader applications can also enable students to read with enjoyment. So, e - reading can also give us abundant physical interaction. However, if you consider e - reading just as some application, it cannot replace the tactile feel. If you hold a book, that is a real feeling which cannot be replicated by e - books.

　　Why do you think the feeling of touch is so important? That is because if you have the feeling of touch, you will increase your concentration on all the things you're doing, and then you'll memorize the content better. As a research has shown, many paper - book readers tend to have a better understanding and memory when reading paper books because they have a higher concentration. That's one aspect.

　　Let me make an analogy. I think the relationship between e - books and real books is just like the carriage and the car. In the past, the carriage was the main way people went out. But today, with the prevalence of cars, people find that a car is faster and more comfortable and provides so many conveniences. Although the experience of riding in a carriage is very unique, the car can serve more people in a more convenient and efficient way. It's similar to e - books and real books. When we read e - books, it is a very beneficial and efficient way. When you go out, all you have to carry is just a device instead of a couple of books. Sometimes carrying multiple books can be very inconvenient.

　　I really agree with you that e - reading can bring a lot of convenience for us. However, today we're not talking about the advantages of e - reading. We are talking about the uniqueness of paper reading that cannot be replaced by e - reading. From our perspective, you cannot use the analogy of the carriage to prove your point. If you engage in paper reading, you'll have more concentration. We can also borrow books from a large library and absorb a large amount of knowledge from them. How can you prove that e - reading can completely replace paper reading?

　　Actually, you have to admit that the main purpose of reading is to acquire knowledge and information. E - books can totally achieve that. You don't even have to go to the library; you just need an Internet connection and can find relevant e - books. If paper books are so superior, why do we see an increasing number of people, especially students and working people, using e - reading devices? The convenience of e - books is becoming more important in our society.

　　I'm not denying that e - books can bring us some convenience. However, that is not the reason why we need to replace paper reading. Paper reading also serves as a cultural symbol for us. When we engage in paper reading, it carries a lot of our cultural materials. I think the convenience of e - reading cannot completely replace paper reading. What's your opinion about that?

　　Actually, you just mentioned about cultural inheritance. I also think that e - books have some unique advantages in cultural inheritance. Through e - books, some very precious cultural books and cultural heritages can be preserved better. They can be more widely spread on the Internet. All people can read and access them regardless of time and place. I believe that the values of cultural inheritance can also be realized through e - books.

　　I believe that e - books can bring a lot of advantages. However, that's not the reason why we need to replace paper reading. You haven't told me why paper reading must be replaced by e - reading. Paper reading also has some unique value for us. For example, when you read a paper book, you can feel the fragrance of the book, be more concentrated, and absorb a lot of knowledge from it. You'll also have more physical interaction with the book and express your love for knowledge. However, if you use e - books, you can never feel this kind of feelings. How can you achieve this result through e - reading?

　　The reason why we say that e - books can replace paper books is that e - books can actually cover almost all the functions of real books. For example, e - books can provide all the information and also offer special experiences.

　　I also agree that e - books can bring us a lot of functions. However, I believe that paper reading really has its unique function. It can give us the real feeling of a book and help us to improve our reading efficiency so that we will grasp a lot of knowledge. Also, we will pass down the knowledge through generations. I believe that paper reading has its uniqueness for us and it cannot be replaced by e - reading. Although e - reading has a lot of convenience and other advantages, paper reading can improve our concentration. Moreover, it can pass on cultural symbols for us to cherish in the future. In summary, we shouldn't replace paper reading.