题目是：Students should learn more from the books and their teachers.

　　正方一辩： 　　Hello, everyone. Today, my opinion is students should learn more from their books and their teachers. You know, students, as we are, are enjoying a very crucial period of their personal growth. So, I think books and their teachers could provide them structured knowledge and proper guidance. Also, if they learn more from books and teachers, it means they are learning in a proper way. It could make sure that they are safe and won't meet any danger.

　　Yes, also in the current educational system, there are learning standards. It means every student has equality in terms of knowledge. So, I think students should learn more from the books and teachers.

　　反方一辩： 　　I think students should learn more from the experience and daily life. I well know that practice is the only criterion for the truth. Learning from the books is always theoretical. From daily life, students can have a more impressive learning experience. For students, those who learn from daily life can have a better understanding of the knowledge. Respectively, it's the essence of real - learning rather than just memorization. Maybe it's the realistic learning or the realistic practice. In my opinion, through daily life, students can find or discover their interests. So, I think it's more effective for learning from experience and daily life.

　　You know our students are not mature enough. So how can you make sure that when they learn from experience, they can recognize whether it is proper experience? I think we can't define whether an experience is correct or not. All experiences have their meanings. Students always get something from their experiences.

　　You think all experiences have meanings, but there are still some bad experiences, such as some bad qualities. If there is no one to tell them it is bad, how can they become better people? Students don't have the ability to distinguish good from bad in the environment to some extent. This is the question of learning from experience, rather than talking about whether it is good or not.

　　I believe that all experiences, even bad ones, have their meanings. Students can gain some insights or experiences from mistakes or other things. I want to say that maybe we can get something from practical experience, like the experiments in chemistry or physics classes. We need to do some experiments, and it won't work if we only learn from books.

　　You just said that experience could teach students different meanings. But I want to say that if a student has the ability to recognize something, it is based on their training and education, which are all about books and teachers. Knowledge can tell them something and develop their abilities. You also mentioned some experiments. I think experiments are often provided at schools.

　　I want to ask you, if you want students to learn more from experience, everyone has different backgrounds. Can you make sure they have equal access to experiences? You know, some people are born into a better environment.

　　We can also learn through experiments at school, and it is a kind of ability or experience. Just from books, we only see words or pictures and can't do it in person.

　　If students learn more from books and teachers, they will get a systematic learning. But if they learn more from experience, there is no system. Only a system can guarantee that students can learn more things. You know the population in our country is so big. How can everyone learn from experience and daily life?

　　We know there are some problems with our education system. A systematic teaching system or knowledge often relies on memorization. I think the requirement for learning and experience is more important.

　　So, in my opinion, middle school students going abroad to study is the golden time and opportunity for students to develop personally and improve their skills. It can broaden their horizons, especially their international perspectives. Secondly, it is a golden opportunity to practice a language in a foreign environment, which is the fastest way to acquire a language.

　　I also think it can develop their ability to live independently. Living independently is beneficial for them to have the ability to think deeply and independently. Lastly, it can help students develop international relationships with wider perspectives and cross - cultural communication skills. All of these are beneficial for one's study.

　　Today, my opinion is that middle school is a crucial period of personal development and information identification. I think middle school students are too young to study abroad. When they go abroad, they will meet problems like culture shock and educational discontinuity.

　　This will also bring a financial burden on the family. Studying abroad is very costly and it will be so expensive for a family. Last but not least, students may face difficulties such as a lack of social and family support networks. So, I think it is not a better choice for middle school students to study abroad. It is better for them to study in their home country.

　　So as you said, maybe the cost for studying abroad is not cheap. But I want to say there are some countries offering scholarships for students to support their study.

　　There is a question. In front of students and their parents, the children's development is of great importance.

　　Okay, you just said a student can get a scholarship in their school. But I think it's still costly for them. We can see from some data on the Internet. You think going abroad to study can provide students with a better environment. How can you say studying domestically is a worse choice? Of course, going abroad is a more beneficial option. As long as you have the opportunity, you can get more resources around the world and experience something totally different from what you can get domestically. So you can develop international perspectives and other skills. It's definitely worthwhile.

　　OK, but middle - school students are just too young. They are teenagers. They may face problems like loneliness and culture shock. I think it's not advisable for parents to let them go abroad so early. I want to ask, if there are some dangers abroad, how can you make sure they are safe?

　　I think the age is not the problem. We can't judge a student's ability or living skills by their age. As you said, maybe it's too early to learn a language abroad. I believe the earlier you learn a language, the better you can master it. So I don't think this is a problem. I think going abroad can offer more opportunities. You can have the chance to develop international relationships and broader perspectives, which you don't have when studying domestically.

　　OK, although you are faced with international opportunities, at the same time, you will encounter problems like loneliness. You can't handle them yet. You think age is not a key issue. But according to physiological theory, middle - school students at this time are not mature enough. Even if there are some very mature students, they are only a small part. So you can't ensure the students' safety when they are studying abroad. You still need to answer my question: How can you say that domestic study is worse than studying abroad?

　　I never said domestic study is worse. I just said going abroad can provide more opportunities and resources. Regarding problems like homesickness, I don't think they are more important than learning. The most important thing is about students' learning, and I believe students can tackle these problems.

　　No, I just want to say psychological problems are as important as learning. You can't ignore this problem.