例如,《在恋爱关系中,应该追求等价的付出·在恋爱关系中,不应该追求等价的付出》一题,辩之竹内共收录26场比赛。我们为您提供这26场比赛的论点、判断标准提取,以及总计数百条论据的提取,还有Deepseek的辩题分析。这可以帮您更好备赛。
欢迎您点击下方按钮,前往查看。
配显示器,显卡可以自己去配,然后可以把这个设备配置得非常出色。对于培训,我不是很了解,我担心到时候会被坑。
According to Amy, she said money can bring us less happiness because money can affect some relationships and bring us more pressure. However, this is not the case. If you have more money, you actually have more resources. You can use money to do things for yourself and solve relationship problems. For example, if your girlfriend doesn't want to talk to you, you can buy something for her. If you have some issues, you can use your money to pay someone to handle them for you. Even if you have some mental health problems, you can seek therapy. That's how money can be used.
I want to say that the happiness brought by material items is short - lived. For instance, if you buy a new car or a big house, it can bring you short - term happiness, but this happiness will fade over time. If you get a car, you may then want a big house. If you get a big house, you will desire even bigger things. So, material possessions can't give you true contentment.
Moreover, more money will bring more stress and some mental problems. Although having more money may come with some stress, in such situations, your money can generate more wealth. You can invest your money in a company, and the company's business can earn you more money.
You mentioned using money to buy things, which only brings short - term pleasure. But if you use money to develop a hobby like traveling, sporting, or skating, that's a long - term source of joy. And all these activities require money. In fact, having little money doesn't mean having no money because you can earn it, and you shouldn't let yourself be penniless.
Still, some people with a lot of money still face great stress or have bad relationships with others. If you have a lot of money, you can't be sure whether the people around you really love you or your money. If you are treated badly because of money by the people you care about, it will cause more serious mental health issues.
I want to say that having enough money is sufficient, but more money doesn't necessarily mean more happiness. It doesn't mean that money will bring true happiness, and this situation can occur everywhere, even when you don't have money.
But if you have a lot of money, you will even have more possibilities of being treated badly.
配显示器,显卡可以自己去配,然后可以把这个设备配置得非常出色。对于培训,我不是很了解,我担心到时候会被坑。
According to Amy, she said money can bring us less happiness because money can affect some relationships and bring us more pressure. However, this is not the case. If you have more money, you actually have more resources. You can use money to do things for yourself and solve relationship problems. For example, if your girlfriend doesn't want to talk to you, you can buy something for her. If you have some issues, you can use your money to pay someone to handle them for you. Even if you have some mental health problems, you can seek therapy. That's how money can be used.
I want to say that the happiness brought by material items is short - lived. For instance, if you buy a new car or a big house, it can bring you short - term happiness, but this happiness will fade over time. If you get a car, you may then want a big house. If you get a big house, you will desire even bigger things. So, material possessions can't give you true contentment.
Moreover, more money will bring more stress and some mental problems. Although having more money may come with some stress, in such situations, your money can generate more wealth. You can invest your money in a company, and the company's business can earn you more money.
You mentioned using money to buy things, which only brings short - term pleasure. But if you use money to develop a hobby like traveling, sporting, or skating, that's a long - term source of joy. And all these activities require money. In fact, having little money doesn't mean having no money because you can earn it, and you shouldn't let yourself be penniless.
Still, some people with a lot of money still face great stress or have bad relationships with others. If you have a lot of money, you can't be sure whether the people around you really love you or your money. If you are treated badly because of money by the people you care about, it will cause more serious mental health issues.
I want to say that having enough money is sufficient, but more money doesn't necessarily mean more happiness. It doesn't mean that money will bring true happiness, and this situation can occur everywhere, even when you don't have money.
But if you have a lot of money, you will even have more possibilities of being treated badly.
以下为ai总结(感谢来自 刘圣韬 学长的精彩ai prompt!基座大模型为豆包。)
In conclusion, we have clearly demonstrated that more money does not equal more happiness. Well, money is necessary, but on the basis of survival, we have happiness. However, more money may cause mental distress or make it difficult to find true contentment.
All in all, what I want to say is that more money means more opportunities. It means you have more options to choose friends, lovers, or even pursue your hobbies. Money can do a lot of things for us, but having less money cannot achieve the same. If you lack money or your money can only support your basic life, you will only have to spend it on necessities.
We can have a few more rounds of free debate in the middle because the opening and closing statements are basically fixed. We can think of a point for the opponent or a point that can defeat ourselves. After all, even if we are opponents, we are still in the same group. In this way, everyone can have more ideas.
Let's first sort out the points we just discussed. You made two points. One is that more money can damage some relationships. I think you said something very good: “More money doesn't mean you have more happiness.” When your funds are sufficient, more money doesn't necessarily mean more happiness. I think you can use this statement later.
Another point is that you can consider how to refute my point that money can bring more choices and allow us to develop our interests into long - term hobbies. I felt that your refutation was a bit far - fetched. My far - fetched point was about the issue of choice. When you have more choices, you may face choice difficulties. For example, if you have a lot of choices, making a decision can be very stressful. If you make a bad choice, it may lead to a bad result. Even if you make a good choice, you may still hesitate, imagining how much better another option might be. This will cause anxiety inside you, and it's hard to deal with because human desires are infinite. Even if you have a lot, you will always feel that you are missing something, even if you have more money.
I mentioned that if you buy a car, you may want to buy a house, and you will always want more things. You said that the happiness these things bring is short - term. In response, I said that you can spend money to cultivate your hobbies, which are long - term. For example, skiing, fitness, or traveling. These are all expensive hobbies that require money to develop, and they can bring long - term fulfillment. But in the process of cultivating these long - term interests, can there be no accidents? For example, when traveling, what if something bad happens?
I originally thought of refuting by saying that even if you have the right to make many choices and can learn many hobbies, you still have to put in your own efforts, and you will still feel pressure during the learning process. But I thought this was a bit far - fetched. You can use this to refute me, which will make the debate more intense.
We can plan how to conduct the debate within the two - minute time limit. We can anticipate the questions the opponent might ask in advance, which will make the debate more exciting instead of relying on impromptu responses. For example, you should think about how to refute my first question, and I'll think about how to refute yours. My first question is usually based on your opening statement. That's how a debate competition works. After your opening statement, the opponent will respond to it, then you raise a question, and after the opponent answers, they will raise a new question. It's a back - and - forth process. If the debate has nothing to do with the opening statement, it will be rated low.
We already know what your opening statement will be because our arguments are limited. We should prepare our lines in advance so that even if there are glitches, we can still express ourselves. You initially argued that more money can damage relationships, bring more pressure, and attract people with false intentions. I didn't refute this point very well at first. You mentioned that you could buy a lot of things for your girlfriend. I didn't really want to talk about this because I think many women today are not like that, but I was blank - minded at that time. I said that you would increasingly desire to buy more things, which would bring short - term pleasure but not long - term satisfaction.
In a debate, you don't have to answer the question directly. If you find a bigger flaw in the opponent's argument, you should target that. This will make the debate more exciting. Sometimes, impromptu responses can lead to self - contradictions. In our first round, I realized that I contradicted myself. You said that there would be people with false intentions around you because of your money. Later, I tried to fix it by saying that no matter how people treat you, as long as you feel happy, that's what matters. We are talking about happiness, not how people treat you.
Let's have two more rounds of debate and then prepare the opening and closing statements. I remember there's an English corner first, and the debate will start at 8 p.m.
OK, for the free debate, according to your previous view, you said that if you have more money, people will pretend to like you because of it, and you will have a lot of stress. But actually, I don't think so. Money can solve the problems caused by stress. If you have mental health problems, you can go to therapy. If you have work stress, you can use your money to travel and relax. And money can attract people to you. Whether their feelings are true or not, you will feel happy because that's the meaning of happiness.
You said that the way people treat you affects your happiness. But I want to say that if you know someone treats you well because of your money, you will start to wonder if they really love you. People have their own choices. Having more money may bring more stress in relationships. You may spend a lot of money to treat someone well, but they may only like your money, which will make you unhappy.
You mentioned some negative phenomena, but these can happen whether you have money or not. If you have no money, you may also encounter people who pretend to like you. When you have money, it's about your mentality. You can go to therapy to adjust your mindset and not pay too much attention to it, so you can relax.
If you don't have money, you can't develop expensive hobbies like skating or traveling. These are long - term pursuits, and when you acquire these skills, you will feel happy. I want to say that if you want to cultivate hobbies, there may be several ways to achieve it, but it doesn't mean that you have to spend a lot of money to learn. When you learn skills, you also need to put in your own efforts and spend a lot of time. It may not cost a fortune, but it means a lot to you in terms of your ability to learn these things.
I agree that if you want to develop a skill, you have to pay some cost. But money gives you the opportunity to learn. If you don't have money, you don't have that opportunity. However, I think money can also bring stress. If you learn one hobby and then want to learn another, and you want to learn a lot of hobbies, you will feel stressed about how to achieve a high level in these hobbies.
In conclusion, we have clearly demonstrated that more money does not equal more happiness. Well, money is necessary, but on the basis of survival, we have happiness. However, more money may cause mental distress or make it difficult to find true contentment.
All in all, what I want to say is that more money means more opportunities. It means you have more options to choose friends, lovers, or even pursue your hobbies. Money can do a lot of things for us, but having less money cannot achieve the same. If you lack money or your money can only support your basic life, you will only have to spend it on necessities.
We can have a few more rounds of free debate in the middle because the opening and closing statements are basically fixed. We can think of a point for the opponent or a point that can defeat ourselves. After all, even if we are opponents, we are still in the same group. In this way, everyone can have more ideas.
Let's first sort out the points we just discussed. You made two points. One is that more money can damage some relationships. I think you said something very good: “More money doesn't mean you have more happiness.” When your funds are sufficient, more money doesn't necessarily mean more happiness. I think you can use this statement later.
Another point is that you can consider how to refute my point that money can bring more choices and allow us to develop our interests into long - term hobbies. I felt that your refutation was a bit far - fetched. My far - fetched point was about the issue of choice. When you have more choices, you may face choice difficulties. For example, if you have a lot of choices, making a decision can be very stressful. If you make a bad choice, it may lead to a bad result. Even if you make a good choice, you may still hesitate, imagining how much better another option might be. This will cause anxiety inside you, and it's hard to deal with because human desires are infinite. Even if you have a lot, you will always feel that you are missing something, even if you have more money.
I mentioned that if you buy a car, you may want to buy a house, and you will always want more things. You said that the happiness these things bring is short - term. In response, I said that you can spend money to cultivate your hobbies, which are long - term. For example, skiing, fitness, or traveling. These are all expensive hobbies that require money to develop, and they can bring long - term fulfillment. But in the process of cultivating these long - term interests, can there be no accidents? For example, when traveling, what if something bad happens?
I originally thought of refuting by saying that even if you have the right to make many choices and can learn many hobbies, you still have to put in your own efforts, and you will still feel pressure during the learning process. But I thought this was a bit far - fetched. You can use this to refute me, which will make the debate more intense.
We can plan how to conduct the debate within the two - minute time limit. We can anticipate the questions the opponent might ask in advance, which will make the debate more exciting instead of relying on impromptu responses. For example, you should think about how to refute my first question, and I'll think about how to refute yours. My first question is usually based on your opening statement. That's how a debate competition works. After your opening statement, the opponent will respond to it, then you raise a question, and after the opponent answers, they will raise a new question. It's a back - and - forth process. If the debate has nothing to do with the opening statement, it will be rated low.
We already know what your opening statement will be because our arguments are limited. We should prepare our lines in advance so that even if there are glitches, we can still express ourselves. You initially argued that more money can damage relationships, bring more pressure, and attract people with false intentions. I didn't refute this point very well at first. You mentioned that you could buy a lot of things for your girlfriend. I didn't really want to talk about this because I think many women today are not like that, but I was blank - minded at that time. I said that you would increasingly desire to buy more things, which would bring short - term pleasure but not long - term satisfaction.
In a debate, you don't have to answer the question directly. If you find a bigger flaw in the opponent's argument, you should target that. This will make the debate more exciting. Sometimes, impromptu responses can lead to self - contradictions. In our first round, I realized that I contradicted myself. You said that there would be people with false intentions around you because of your money. Later, I tried to fix it by saying that no matter how people treat you, as long as you feel happy, that's what matters. We are talking about happiness, not how people treat you.
Let's have two more rounds of debate and then prepare the opening and closing statements. I remember there's an English corner first, and the debate will start at 8 p.m.
OK, for the free debate, according to your previous view, you said that if you have more money, people will pretend to like you because of it, and you will have a lot of stress. But actually, I don't think so. Money can solve the problems caused by stress. If you have mental health problems, you can go to therapy. If you have work stress, you can use your money to travel and relax. And money can attract people to you. Whether their feelings are true or not, you will feel happy because that's the meaning of happiness.
You said that the way people treat you affects your happiness. But I want to say that if you know someone treats you well because of your money, you will start to wonder if they really love you. People have their own choices. Having more money may bring more stress in relationships. You may spend a lot of money to treat someone well, but they may only like your money, which will make you unhappy.
You mentioned some negative phenomena, but these can happen whether you have money or not. If you have no money, you may also encounter people who pretend to like you. When you have money, it's about your mentality. You can go to therapy to adjust your mindset and not pay too much attention to it, so you can relax.
If you don't have money, you can't develop expensive hobbies like skating or traveling. These are long - term pursuits, and when you acquire these skills, you will feel happy. I want to say that if you want to cultivate hobbies, there may be several ways to achieve it, but it doesn't mean that you have to spend a lot of money to learn. When you learn skills, you also need to put in your own efforts and spend a lot of time. It may not cost a fortune, but it means a lot to you in terms of your ability to learn these things.
I agree that if you want to develop a skill, you have to pay some cost. But money gives you the opportunity to learn. If you don't have money, you don't have that opportunity. However, I think money can also bring stress. If you learn one hobby and then want to learn another, and you want to learn a lot of hobbies, you will feel stressed about how to achieve a high level in these hobbies.
以下为ai总结(感谢来自 刘圣韬 学长的精彩ai prompt!基座大模型为豆包。)