The superpowers mean that I can be the person I love and that love is real and consensual without forcing the other person. It can promote an equal relationship.
Although in some relationships, they are built on manipulation and inequality. Don't you think it is another form of pua? You treat the person just like an object rather than a person. And I have a question for you. If you don't let the other have freedom, what reason do you have to say that you love him or her? To be clear, it is not love, it is just your manipulation.
The superpowers are not about manipulation but about creating opportunities for two people to achieve emotional equality and mutual understanding. And a superpower doesn't take away freedom but promotes healthier and more authentic love.
If you think that using the superpower doesn't go against human freedom, then why, if freedom isn't lost in this relationship, did we refuse arranged marriage and pursue free marriage during the May 4th Movement? We know that authoritarian parents are controlling and make arrangements without considering their children's feelings. We know that it is not good for the child and none of us want to become authoritarian parents. So when it comes to love, why do you force your loved one to love you back?
I compare it with authoritarian parents.
But the superpower is about promoting emotional response and freedom, not about emotional indifference. Superpowers can help eliminate the misunderstanding and create emotional bonds between both parties. The purpose of superpowers is to promote happiness, not to control. I have no reason not to use this power. And if you had it, when would you use it?
You say that using the superpower isn't forcing your loved one to love you back, but we know that it is not their true feeling. It is just you making them love you. So this relationship is actually unhealthy and is unable to solve the fundamental problem. Maybe at first you will be happy, but after a while, you will realize that you are just deceiving yourselves. And when he or she says "I love you, baby", will you feel happy? I think not because you know that it is based on the superpower.
The purpose of doing so is to ensure that both individuals have the chance to truly understand each other, eliminate misunderstanding and emotional dilemmas, and make free and authentic judgments on whether they are suitable for each other, rather than allowing an artificial relationship to handle the thoughts and communication of both parties. And the superpower is not only to promote individual lives but also can influence society to be happier. We can improve the loving relationship in society by facilitating their closeness for a more connected world.
The superpowers mean that I can be the person I love and that love is real and consensual without forcing the other person. It can promote an equal relationship.
Although in some relationships, they are built on manipulation and inequality. Don't you think it is another form of pua? You treat the person just like an object rather than a person. And I have a question for you. If you don't let the other have freedom, what reason do you have to say that you love him or her? To be clear, it is not love, it is just your manipulation.
The superpowers are not about manipulation but about creating opportunities for two people to achieve emotional equality and mutual understanding. And a superpower doesn't take away freedom but promotes healthier and more authentic love.
If you think that using the superpower doesn't go against human freedom, then why, if freedom isn't lost in this relationship, did we refuse arranged marriage and pursue free marriage during the May 4th Movement? We know that authoritarian parents are controlling and make arrangements without considering their children's feelings. We know that it is not good for the child and none of us want to become authoritarian parents. So when it comes to love, why do you force your loved one to love you back?
I compare it with authoritarian parents.
But the superpower is about promoting emotional response and freedom, not about emotional indifference. Superpowers can help eliminate the misunderstanding and create emotional bonds between both parties. The purpose of superpowers is to promote happiness, not to control. I have no reason not to use this power. And if you had it, when would you use it?
You say that using the superpower isn't forcing your loved one to love you back, but we know that it is not their true feeling. It is just you making them love you. So this relationship is actually unhealthy and is unable to solve the fundamental problem. Maybe at first you will be happy, but after a while, you will realize that you are just deceiving yourselves. And when he or she says "I love you, baby", will you feel happy? I think not because you know that it is based on the superpower.
The purpose of doing so is to ensure that both individuals have the chance to truly understand each other, eliminate misunderstanding and emotional dilemmas, and make free and authentic judgments on whether they are suitable for each other, rather than allowing an artificial relationship to handle the thoughts and communication of both parties. And the superpower is not only to promote individual lives but also can influence society to be happier. We can improve the loving relationship in society by facilitating their closeness for a more connected world.
以下为ai总结(感谢来自 刘圣韬 学长的精彩ai prompt！基座大模型为豆包。)
双方讨论流程
- 一方提出超能力意味着能成为自己想成为的人，在爱情里能促进平等关系，不会强迫他人，是真实且双方自愿的爱。
- 另一方反驳称在一些关系中存在操纵和不平等，这是一种PUA，把人当物品而非人，还质问如果不让对方有自由，凭什么说爱对方，这不是爱而是操纵。
- 一方回应超能力不是操纵，而是为两人创造情感平等和相互理解的机会，超能力不剥夺自由，而是促进更健康、更真实的爱。
- 另一方以五四时期追求自由婚姻反对包办婚姻为例，质问如果超能力不违背人类自由，那为何当时要追求自由婚姻，还将超能力使用者类比为专制的父母。
- 一方表示超能力是促进情感回应和自由，不是情感冷漠，能消除误解、建立情感纽带，目的是促进幸福而非控制，还反问对方如果有超能力会何时使用。
- 另一方反驳称使用超能力让对方爱自己不是对方的真实感受，这种关系不健康，无法解决根本问题，开始可能会幸福但之后会发现是自欺欺人。
- 一方最后强调这样做（使用超能力）的目的是确保双方有机会真正理解彼此，消除误解和情感困境，做出自由真实的判断，超能力不仅能促进个人生活，还能让社会更幸福，改善社会中的恋爱关系。
我不认为我们应该使用超能力让所爱的人爱我们。因为使用超能力，对于被选中的人来说，这违背了他们的自由意志；对于自己而言，这会降低幸福感。一段时间之后，你可能只会感到愧疚和不安，因为你知道这是基于你的超能力。所以，我认为我们不应该使用超能力。
至于“好和什么？这次感觉打的好和平是吗？因为我们都知道了吗。还要说吗？我，我觉得我们到时候可以装做不和OK没没关系，听不懂就。”这部分内容与反方四辩总结陈词无关，予以删除。
我不认为我们应该使用超能力让所爱的人爱我们。因为使用超能力，对于被选中的人来说，这违背了他们的自由意志；对于自己而言，这会降低幸福感。一段时间之后，你可能只会感到愧疚和不安，因为你知道这是基于你的超能力。所以，我认为我们不应该使用超能力。
至于“好和什么？这次感觉打的好和平是吗？因为我们都知道了吗。还要说吗？我，我觉得我们到时候可以装做不和OK没没关系，听不懂就。”这部分内容与反方四辩总结陈词无关，予以删除。
以下为ai总结(感谢来自 刘圣韬 学长的精彩ai prompt！基座大模型为豆包。)
重要概念定义
- 超能力：在本辩题语境下未明确提及具体类型的超能力，可理解为一种超越常人能力范围，能够直接影响他人情感（让所爱的人爱自己）的特殊能力。
判断标准
- 从行为对他人和自己的影响是否积极来判断是否应该使用超能力让所爱的人爱自己。
分论点与事实佐证
- 违背他人自由意志。
- 事实佐证：无（文本未给出具体事例，但从逻辑上如果使用超能力让他人爱自己，他人原本不爱却因超能力而爱，就是违背其自由选择爱与不爱的意志）。
- 分论点如何服务于判断标准：违背他人自由意志是对他人产生的消极影响，按照判断标准，这种消极影响说明不应该使用超能力。
- 降低自己幸福感并产生愧疚不安。
- 事实佐证：无（文本未给出具体事例，但从逻辑上阐述了使用超能力后的结果是一段时间后会有愧疚和不安，从而降低幸福感）。
- 分论点如何服务于判断标准：对自己产生消极影响（降低幸福感、产生愧疚不安），按照判断标准，这种消极影响说明不应该使用超能力。
结论
因为使用超能力让所爱的人爱自己会违背他人自由意志，也会给自己带来消极影响（降低幸福感、产生愧疚不安），所以不应该使用超能力。
本环节金句
- 因为使用超能力，对于被选中的人来说，这违背了他们的自由意志。
- 对于自己而言，这会降低幸福感。
- 一段时间之后，你可能只会感到愧疚和不安，因为你知道这是基于你的超能力。
