The cross - examination may begin. We have the second speaker for the negative side cross - examine the first speaker from the affirmative side. You can begin now.

　　OK. Nowadays, they already have a system to protect their information. Before the products are in the market, there is information about them. So, whatever one wants to look at, there will be a protection system provided. I think that... Well, thank you. Do you have other points? The government will also help to keep it.

　　Now, I will let the first speaker of the opposing side start their opening statement. We have three minutes for this opening statement.

　　辩题：the advancement of robotics threaten human privacy（机器人的发展威胁人类隐私）vs the advancement of robotics do not threaten human privacy（机器人的发展不威胁人类隐私）

　　环节：正方二辩·交叉质询·反方一辩

　　正方二辩：Next, you proceed to the cross - examination. Please have the second speaker for the A side cross - examine the speaker for the B side. You can begin in twenty seconds.

　　正方二辩：But now, there are sometimes. Holiday, they sometimes have a situation for me. On the Internet, I think that they are sending that information to other companies and together.

　　正方二辩：You can go on.

　　Ah, um, so thank you for the speeches. Now we are entering the summary of the cross - examination. Let's welcome the second speaker. You have ninety seconds to summarize for your team to begin.

　　Our position is that technology has various uses. For example, it can prevent necessities. Our second core point is that openness provides strong support for personal privacy and involves the idea of general different regulations. We firmly believe in the dignity of human beings. And I want to remind the speaker that you have to go. You have no break. Thank you.

　　Thank you. The second speaker from you will have ninety seconds. You can begin the speech now. OK. So, and you also say right, but, but you can, everyone and be punish by, but, but million of million of people there things please OK.

　　校对后：Thank you. The second speaker, you will have ninety seconds. You can start your speech now. You also said it right. However, everyone can be punished by millions upon millions of people. That's all. Thank you.

　　辩题：the advancement of robotics threaten human privacy（机器人的发展威胁人类隐私）vs the advancement of robotics do not threaten human privacy（机器人的发展不威胁人类隐私）

　　环节：正方三辩·PtP Debate·反方三辩

　　正方三辩： 　　Thank last we proceedceive（此处应为proceed，“proceedceive”为错误表述） the points point debates in the session. We have ninety seconds for each side. Um, the speeches of both part（此处应为both parts）, the alternativen（此处应为alternate） of orternate（此处应为alternate） which one party amiming（此处应为aiming） the speech and the other into speech one time has lostity（此处应为lost it）, the other side can continue the speech. The end time on the bum（此处应为both） side now you time start when you stand up OK. Robot on theu'Chinese（此处表述不通顺，可忽略）. Also many also areri（此处应为are） other not however very very actually but actually maybe the I don't think this just. Like robots are a（此处表述不通顺，可忽略） and we know that AI are very intelligence（此处应为intelligent） so the also very（此处表述不通顺，可忽略） and can our it can our information deeply that're（此处表述不通顺，可忽略） and maybe we didn't know like collecting our collecting our information and it really paper（此处应为pose，“pose a threat”表示构成威胁） for our privacy this is so improve（此处应为a problem，根据语境推测） and about it maybe can. Some to protect our policyva（此处应为private） information so I mean that it is as is it so maybe that it can use some to the abuseing（此处应为abusing） our OK.

　　整理后： 　　在这个环节中，我们将进行观点辩论，双方各有90秒时间。机器人和人工智能都很智能，它们能够深入获取我们的信息，也许我们都不知道，比如收集我们的信息，这确实对我们的隐私构成了威胁。虽然也许有一些措施来保护我们的私人信息，但它可能会被滥用。

　　Thank you for the speeches of the five debaters. Now, let's end the summary of this point - to - point debate. First, let's invite the Pro side's third debater to give a speech.

　　Now, monitors and the demonstration of these devices are increasingly not guarding our personal information security. Events include the leakage of information. There is also a real difference. So we think that reporters can collect and share our personal data easily. And both of these are quite legal in the field of robots. So there is no way to protect our privacy information. Therefore, we truly believe that in the future development, robots will pose a threat to our privacy.

　　辩题为：The advancement of robotics threatens human privacy vs The advancement of robotics does not threaten human privacy。 　　环节为：Free Debate

　　正方：在许多公司中，机器人技术正在广泛传播。政府想要有所作为，这是我们国家的责任所在。也许多年前就已经开始尝试，但我们需要从全球的角度来讨论这个问题，世界上有些地方情况可能不太好。现在准备系统已经很完善了。在中国，这是政府的责任，从全球范围来看也是正确的。如果政府不这样做就会出现问题。

　　反方：你刚刚讲话没有扣时间，我先中断一下。我知道刚刚大概讲了多久，差不多时间了。我有两个问题。首先，请拿出直接数据来证明世界上所有政府都这么做了，而你们没有做到，很不幸，不应该这样，实际上没有这样的权利。三年来，我们有很多法律方面的探索。如果是购物和习惯等大数据方面，这不够清晰。一些公司或者网站分析或者关联数据，这是实际情况。但这不是我们所知道的一些公司正在做的正确的事，如果你们想要改进，请获取那些没有的数据。不，不是这样的。

　　Thank you. Ladies and gentlemen, we now enter the conclusion schedule. In this part, each side has three minutes to give the concluding statement.

　　We will talk about the speakers from the side of "because now of robot". Well, a thing has been mentioned. That is because employing intelligence, which is an important technological action and has actionability in recording and processing private information. Protecting private information is crucial. Take household robots, cooking robots, etc. for example. When they are in use, such as when driving, they are indeed a threat to our privacy.

　　The development of robotics and the collection of personal information, like in American shopping, data in social networks and other information, are integrated into our systems. This creates a risk that human information may be misused. It is clear that we should be cautious about all aspects of our rights strategy as technology continues to evolve. Crucially, we should take action to ensure that privacy is protected while also promoting innovation. This is partly for the good of humanity.