So, thank you. Now let's move on to the opening statement by the negative side. The first speaker from the negative side will have three minutes to present our opening statement.

　　The modern communication and information situation is complex. In the natural course of time, it is important to disclose information to the public, engage in building self - media processes and practices. Sometimes, information extends or is distorted. And the information available to people remains a facility for both important information and misinformation. Since the power of this course remains concentrated in the hands of a few, leading to an unbalanced representation of the media. Even in the past seven years, the main source of information, the proportion of posts and so on...

　　(However, the original text seems rather unclear and incomplete in terms of expressing a complete and logical argument. This is the best attempt at correction and organization based on what is provided.)

　　辩题为：getting closer to the truth vs getting further away the truth。 　　环节：正方二辩·Cross Examination·反方一辩。

　　正方二辩：是不是？Cross examination（交叉质询环节），有请正方二辩质询反方一辩。好的，那我开始问了。我想问，由人们带来的美国OFS（此处OFS表意不明，可能是语音转写错误，但按要求忠实原文），你有时间的话可以说点什么。

　　Thank you for the speech. Now we will enter the summary of the cross - examination. Let's welcome the second speaker from the negative side. You will have nineteen seconds.

　　The PRO mentioned some information about people. However, this information may be wrong. It is more difficult to find legal control. According to this, people are getting further away from the truth.

　　Thank you, the second speaker from the affirmative side. You will have ninety seconds. I will repeat my opinion. I have an experiment here, and I'm going to talk to you.

　　As we will proceed to the point - to - point debate in this session, we will have ninety seconds for each side. The speeches of both parties will alternate, with one party ending their speech and the other beginning theirs. When the time has exhausted for one side, the other side can continue their speech till the end of the time. On the affirmative side, your time starts when you stand up.

　　About most and also talk about there. OK, you make the food is just and actually in the information is very rough, and some of the information occurs and we be to the truth. It means there exists the back effect once the room, once these room there is more, even can be more than rule. To get closer.

　　So, thank you for the speech. The speech is a process. Now, let's enter the summary session of the point - to - point debate. First, let's invite the affirmative side to speak. You will have nineteen seconds to make your speech.

　　Social media. Chinese social media is being talked about. But the key is people and information. All are related. And, most importantly, it supports some. All the victims of online bullying can also help themselves on social media. And that's why.

　　Away from the facts, and you are assisted by us. It is actually sorted by social media. So, according to the state of the science of information spread in two months, how can we? I want to say something. Thank you for the speech.

　　辩题为：getting closer to the truth vs getting further away from the truth 　　环节为：Free Debate

　　在双方下周将有一场自由辩论，每方有三分钟时间。正方先阐述信息更快的观点。

　　在我们人类社会中，人们能够获取更多用途（此处表述不清，可能存在错误，但按原文校对），但实际上现在提到它可能会有反作用，这种作用更多地体现在对事物的看法上，甚至会加深人们（此处“people'ss”应为“people's”）的某些观念。而且，人们更容易表达自己，以及他们过去在某个方面不能做的事情现在可以做了，就像在某个角落里的狭隘行为一样，你如何反驳这个结论呢？因为我们正在讨论，现在正在讨论，我们正在讨论社交媒体，所以真相总是取决于人们去寻找。所以她（此处“she she”表述不清，按原文校对）可以尝试很多，这个女孩成功了，但是她做这件事的能力如何呢？是的，人们想要得到东西，是的，人们想要摆脱男孩（此处表述不清，按原文校对），我的意思是互联网，但实际上关于这个账号（此处“the the the as account”表述不清，按原文校对），这意味着社交媒体有能力让现实做出选择，所以我问你，你是怎么想的呢？那些公司的信息能力，但是我们知道，在社交媒体与传统（此处表述不完整，按原文校对）的特征之一就是信息化。好的，谢谢。在四方行动（此处表述不清，按原文校对）美国已经提到过这个时间，我们可以写，只有我们可以写多少。

　　Thank you. We now move to the conclusion session. In this session, each side will have three minutes to give the concluding statement. We will start with the fourth speaker from the affirmative side.

　　The topic I have is that people's ability may affect social media. Social media means people have to get such messages and form them, giving more chances to know the truth from a social perspective. It is more likely to know the truth from social information platforms, which can also provide objective materials, leading to a broader understanding of different and potential findings. We also have the benefit of time because the short time of public discussion is about getting closer to the truth. Additionally, it is open to everyone, and any of them can help. It allows a wide range of voices to support the discussion. In social media, even though there are many victims due to the lack of information, their voices... Thank you.

　　The topic of the debate is: getting closer to the truth vs getting further away from the truth. 　　This is the Concluding Statement by the fourth debater of the negative side.

　　In this debate, I really think that there are some truths like women having the same ability as men. This was not the case before, but it is now because people have changed, and so has this truth. To reach the actual situation in America, second, we mentioned various positions. We also mentioned that under the facts of more vision backfiring, it is plugged into Europe, um, to have deeper jobs in what China already has. Um, to have different jobs in what it means that it actually prefers to train their activities. Third, in terms of the ability to change in September, also, the Internet and social media develop how people break down problems.

　　So, I'm now reiterating our point. First, in terms of information, indeed, the right piece is still in everyone's hands, but of course, I comment on and notice that not all of these voices are currently controlled by the capital. I have done research on building and video, and common media problems are what information is. Their years of exposing truth through media and the mother of the Internet mean that information is for the modern public to understand. Making social media open for economic facts means that the fact is exaggerated. The more information there is, the further away from the truth it may be. This not only requires people to see what they prefer, more importantly, it goes back to individuals. For one person's impression, when it is needed for an individual to be different and have more information but it doesn't match what was used before, unless all information is included to completely break down their old views, people will be more advanced than others. And among more information, people receive those very rights. Since it is very different from what people followed, people would defend their authenticity and would depend on the data to prove that they are.

　　Thank you for the one - page summary. Of course, this round of the debate has come to an end, and the next group of debaters should be ready for the competition. Thank you.

　　However, in some international schools, they attach great importance to the first two aspects. Their children are not able to pursue a very professional understanding. It is too profound for them.

　　Each person has their own situation. For example, high school students have too much homework. They only have twenty minutes for lunch.

　　I am not sure if it is over. Where are you? I am in Guangle. Right. I am not in charge of hosting this time. Are you from Mingde? It should be quite late now. Right. At this time, we should go to sleep until 11 o'clock. We are in the first or second quarter. They all have their own situations.