Good afternoon. Today our point is that to be the leader of the journey which is supposed to go through eighty-one difficulties, one must possess the ability to unite the team, the calm and steady character to support the success of the journey, and the courage to face difficulties. We believe Sha Seng has all these qualities. Let's show you from three aspects.

　　Firstly, we think Sha Seng is really good at sorting out disagreements among the team. With his temperate nature, Sha Seng will prevent the situation from escalating. When Zhu Bajie fails to respect his master's decisions because he is unhappy with some choices, Sha Seng will gently talk him into respecting the decisions. At the same time, he leads the team smoothly, as he clearly knows what each member is thinking, avoiding any communication breakdown. Certainly, we think that Sha Seng possesses the crucial qualities of being reliable and emotionally stable as a leader.

　　For example, in the incident of the True and False Monkey King, he dealt with the conflict between the team members and succeeded in uniting the team.

　　And the third point is that Sha Seng never backs down at a critical moment and always moves forward bravely. For instance, in the battle against the Yellow Robe Monster.

　　In the statement. Thank you, chairperson, judges, and fellow debaters. Good day to you all. Our side holds the view that Bajie is difficult to be the leader. Here are the reasons of our side. In terms of personality, Bajie has a strong affinity, and it is well worth noting. However, in wisdom, he is unable to unite all the members to jointly obtain the scriptures. For example, in the chapter of the True and False Monkey King, after the Monkey King was misunderstood and returned to the Mountain of Flowers and Fruits, Bajie did not go to invite the Monkey King. Eventually, he failed to resolve the conflict among the master and the disciples, and also failed to maintain the ability of the scripture expedition. In terms of abilities, although he is somewhat capable of writing and answering in his own way, he is not very reliable in carrying out tasks. Moreover, he does not have a certain amount of management wisdom. He does not know how to diligently allocate power appropriately and adapt to changes in the journey.

　　Explain what you exactly mean by a a p is good at dealing with the complex between. A a whattown and 悟空。Could you please examin that. The how how how can this a demonstrate he has this a demonstrate he has the ability to become the leader. Very good at the communication between a and person so he is very uh he's very excellent he's a veryy excellent person to a communicate with others such as the so call or the PU town. So as for her for his advantage he can he can he can tackle with good relationships or between the. In your argument. The relationships or between the people uh in your argument your arguments you say that a taxi has the ability to fight against monsters and do you think the ability to five the monster is necessary wrong. It's the necessary ability to become a leader and can this be a be the followersers uh can Dis ability be the power of the team yes the ability to communicate with address very important in the team so we think uh uh Juba is very uh is'very uh.'a good choice to be leader in the encounter difficulties but they always say they will they always say they will uh uh sign the skin and go back to where where they come from. （此段内容中存在较多难以理解的表述和错误，已尽量按照要求进行书面化处理，但部分内容可能存在逻辑和语义上的问题）

　　我们都知道，一个好的领导者具备与团队中其他人沟通的能力是非常重要的。那么请问，沙僧是否具备这种能力或优势呢？我们认为，沙僧更善于调整团队成员之间的关系，甚至比八戒做得更好。我们都知道，八戒喜欢解决问题，但这容易引发团队内部的冲突，而沙僧能够更好地调整团队关系。但是，有很多例子证明，猪八戒比沙和尚更优秀。您能否给我举一个例子呢？比如，在《西游记》第三章的白骨精那一节中，猪八戒告诉唐僧，孙悟空杀了人，这导致孙悟空离开了取经队伍，回到了花果山。如果不是因为八戒察觉到唐僧的情绪和想法，他们的关系可能就破裂了。八戒能够洞察到唐僧的情绪，这也能够促进团队的和谐。

　　首先，对方提到有四点关键内容，但我方认为其第一点，即让所有人团结在一起，以我方团队成员的角度来看，这是不切实际的。就像我方团队成员所说，这会导致孙悟空离开团队。其次，对方认为猪八戒战斗能力更强且可靠，但我方认为，沙僧在水中的能力超强，相比之下，猪八戒在水中的能力较弱。而且，作为领导，必须具备良好的说服他人跟随的能力。猪八戒曾是天蓬元帅，在天庭时，他的能力是很不错的，并且他在团队中能够将大家联系在一起。

　　是不是我们作为回答的人必须是固定的，这是第一步。我当时提问是针对你们四个人，你们需指定一个人来回答，但他自己站出来的，不是说 1 吗？首先，对于优秀领导者，我认为所有这些特质对于服从者和普通成员来说是多方面的，而对于优秀领导者的特定要求则更为复杂。那么，你们如何看待优秀的领导者？你们认为是什么造就了优秀的领导者？我认为沙僧的表现并非完全缺乏独立的意见和决策能力，而是体现了谨慎和稳重。这是一个重要的考验，他清楚自己能力的局限，所以不会轻易做出轻率的决定，但这并不意味着他没有自己的想法。当团队面临一些非原则性问题和日常事务时，往往是基于团队整体利益的考虑。例如，在（某个事件中），提到红孩儿，我不想念这个名字，后来提到了唐僧，唐僧和他的教诲以及纪律，当面对强大的红孩儿，唐僧没有选择退缩或逃避，而是和徒弟们一起前进。还有，悟空想要教训每个人，不放弃，不总是假装沉默分离。比如，面对白骨精的麻烦，沙僧的行为表明他会选择保持冷静，甚至巧妙地促进团队成员之间的关系。你们如何看待这种沟通和表达能力？这种表达能力并非体现在言语的数量上，而更重要的是表达的有效性和准确性。虽然沙僧话不多，但他说的话很有针对性，能够切中要点，所以他不会说太多废话。例如，在（某个事件中），唐僧叫走孙悟空，因为（某个原因），所有人都满意，他没有抱怨，而是默默承受并安慰（某人）。

　　Today, we did not hear your standards for judging whether a person is suitable to be a leader or not. I can summarize my points into two. Firstly, you think two aspects can adjust the relationship within the team. Secondly, you think he is reliable because he fought with the monsters. However, we can tell you that Sha Seng also fought with the monsters, so all of them have disadvantages. How can you say that Ba Jie is better? In terms of adjusting relationships, we know that in the chapter of the White Bone Demon, it is Ba Jie who sowed discord between Tang Sanzang and Sun Wukong, which led to Sun Wukong returning to Huaguo Mountain.

　　To make of. Okay, uh, the opponents said that the Sand Monk didn't have the ability to lead the team. But I want to say our judging criteria today is about who is the most suitable to be the leader of the journey to the West, referring to the scriptures, and who has the potential to lead the team. However, in the logic of the opponents, the main statement is about the quality of the Sand Monk himself rather than the leadership quality of the team. And you ask me the just basis. There didn't link the connection between the team. I want to say it has a strong emphasis. He can easily pick into the Tang Monk's inner most thoughts, which is an ability that the powerful Monkey King and others don't have. Although Zhu Bajie is rough on the outside, he is very dedicated on the inside. In the journey, when Guanyin told Wukong not to listen to Tang Monk's desolation and be the woman, but Zhu Bajie knew that the woman was the monster. However, he ignored it and just understood Tang Monk's compassion and knew that Tang Monk needs compassionate persons. So, I think he is the most suitable. OK.

　　Each group has four minutes. We ask them questions and they answer. Let's begin. I can only have one person. I want to ask the second debate on the other side. Well, I was asking questions. Uh, my question is: Is the capability to fight against monsters necessary for being a leader in the team? The ability to fight with monsters is equal to the ability to work, and is it necessary for a leader to have the workability? While Sha Seng also has the capability to fight against monsters, and I can't see the advantage. To fight against monsters and I can't see the advantages of Party.

　　OK, I think yours don't understand. Ours is we don't think capability is a necessary factor of being reliable, but it means he can eliminate the 20 seconds. It is the cat to different members. If he didn't have, like I'm speaking. One question: What's your standard? First, first, being able to lead and everyone achieving the goal of successfully obtaining scriptures. OK, I will show you one example. Zhu Bajie and Sha Seng together go to the monsters. How to save the princess? However, Zhu Bajie was caught by the monster, and he didn't inform Sun Wukong and Tang Sanzang this information in time. Instead, he slept in the haystack until midnight. If you always focus on just one mistake of one person, you are very silly. So we think we should see more examples. As we all know, Zhu Bajie has very good flexibilities to make the change rather than Sha Seng. Sha Seng is more well-behaved or Frank or honest. Well-behaved or Frank or honest, and never makes little changes or revolutions. So a leader should have the ability to change and the flexibility to lead to the success. So we think this is the better advantage of Zhu Bajie. So we want to ask: Do you think you have this ability?

　　On the contrary, I always focus on one mistake. However, Zhu Bajie did this and Sha Seng never did this. So we can see that Sha Seng is more responsible than Zhu Bajie. He never escapes or disregards the safety of his teammates. Instead of sleeping in the grass and not going back to inform Tang Sanzang and Sun Wukong in time when the eldest apprentice was captured. And I want to see, please pay attention to your two brothers' laziness and the last of his own personal authorities. They cannot arise to the weakening of the leadership ability. He can lead the team, but he can also be lazy. So can you tell me how one person like this can adjust the relationship between the team? Can't he lead to more conflicts?

　　If you think Sha Seng is always the same and never does anything, while Zhu Bajie is always sleeping away. But you should know that there is a difference between the two people. So we think if you want to be a good leader, you should have good flexibility to change or have very diverse experiences. Also, you can't use Chinese to speak with us.

　　You have seen that the lack of innovation is actually a kind of dedication to grow and careful control of risks in such a difficult task. And as learning innovation does not mean blind Chinese methods, but needs to be carried out under the premise that the goal is achieved. Just understood the importance and difficulty of the journey. So he preferred to play it steadily and proceeded according to the established plan. For example, when the White Bone Demon captured Tang Sanzang, Sun Wukong completely left for the reason that Zhu Bajie wanted to give up the journey to obtain the scriptures. But Sha Seng firmly stated that he would continue to look for his master. It didn't lack innovation. It's just better.

　　So what's your problem? OK, as we all know, Zhu Bajie has very diverse and large experiences to promote his decision. So he can be more decisive and very ripe or mature to make a decision. This is a very important ability to be a leader. Do you think Sha Seng doesn't have this?

　　Zhu Bajie likes to spread the negative emotions among the team. He always shouts to break up when they meet a difficult situation. And we think this person can't lead a team better because the journey to the Buddhist scriptures is very difficult. And they don't like to always hear about the negative emotions. It is more than that. I think even though we have many samples, but I think it's just the same thing. Can we, even if we cannot just say that? We always say that if I just as you see. If we have Sha Seng as every leader, we have a dull leader and a dull leader makes a dull team. We need a more energetic team that means innovation, not just keeping silent, just being obedient, just to follow his members. That's not a good leader. That's a good member. Never complained. A completed can result in a com. Besides, I think you make of.

　　Today, you give us two reasons that can be. The first is adjusting the relationship, and the second and third one is that he is reliable. He fought with monsters. And we have told you that both of them have the second advantage, so you can't say that Zhu Bajie is a better leader than Sha Seng. Your reason is unreasonable. And we told you that Zhu Bajie likes to solve discord, and this can lead to a conflict between the team. You didn't answer it, and I think your logic is very strange. You said that the complaints can lead to a solution. I didn't understand where the logic is. And I hope that you can explain it more clearly. And we said that Zhu Bajie likes to spread negative emotions. In the past of the Buddhist scripture, as we all know, the past is never easy. Today we want to discuss who should be the leader. If we go back to the past, first of all, we need to consider what is most important for a leader. And we have already given the answer today. The ability to connect the team and allocate work reasonably is rather than expecting in a certain field. The road to the fast Buddhist scripture is full of difficulties. A long-term hardship can easily cause problems within a team. We need someone with a good temper and the ability to consider relationships, that is, a sensible person.

　　For me, in this final work, the other thing is that Zhu Bajie didn't have the ability to be the leader. Zhu Bajie is the one who was the Marshal Tianpeng. He had eighty thousand of soldiers before he became the Zhu Bajie. And I know that Zhu Bajie is the most suitable leader in the team on the journey to the west. Our judging criteria today is about who is the most suitable to be the leader of the journey to the west to learn from the scriptures and who has the potential to be the leader to lead the team to learn from the scriptures. However, the logic of the opponent's defense friends' main statement is the quality of Sha Seng himself. And you just agree with that. A must said that Sha Seng has the ability of its specificity and submissiveness, but it is not suitable for becoming a leader. We believe that a basic leader should have the most basic charisma and advocating power, but Sha Seng doesn't have that. Something that Sha Seng really doesn't have is true body laziness and loss, which are his own personal qualities. They cannot rise to the weakening of the leadership ability. We should understand that emotional intelligence, just EQ, is the indispensable skill for leadership, and the leadership is not a person who is selected but the person who is needed. The approach of the four corrected points and the aid precepts should be that Zhu Bajie is the most mortal temperamenter and the temperate. Although he has not become a Buddha, the most important reason is that he understands people's hearts too well.