Now we'll have negative one to speak. Please be clear when you start to click the time. Time, you know. Now, our position is that the most important social function of the painting is its ability to communicate and connect with people on a deep emotional level and foster cultural identification. The artistry refers to the skilled creativity and imagination that artists bring to their work, encompassing the unique style, technique, and expression that make a piece of art distinctive and impactful. Therefore, the artistry of the painting has its ability to convey complex ideas and emotions. It better reflects the social function than the authenticity of the painting. Social function and the authenticity of a painting give people identity and belonging. But, however, as an audience, the accuracy of a painting only tells me the knowledge of history. It does not connect me with the painter emotionally. There is no communication happening and certainly no impact for us. Take the picture of Washington crossing the Delaware as an example. Despite the same historical significance, the Louiswis painting created in 1851 in Germany was inspired by the revolutionary spirit and aimed to encourage the democratic movement in Europe. The image of Washington standing resolutely at the bow of the boat, surrounded by a diverse group of soldiers, serves as a powerful symbol of leadership and unity. The light in the painting symbolizes hope, and the small boat reflects the current of determination. Its emotional resonance has made it an important part of American culture. It has become an integral part of American cultural heritage, produced in countless texts, exhibited in metropolitan museums of art. It has helped to define the narratives of American independence and has become a symbol of national pride. This cultural significance underlines its social function as an underlying force that unites individuals to events and shared values. While a painting may be more historically accurate in terms of setting and details, it lacks the same level of symbolic power and emotional impact. Though its emotional impact and cultural significance messages continue to resonate, providing that art can be a catalyst for change and for culture.
Now we'll have negative one to speak. Please be clear when you start to click the time. Time, you know. Now, our position is that the most important social function of the painting is its ability to communicate and connect with people on a deep emotional level and foster cultural identification. The artistry refers to the skilled creativity and imagination that artists bring to their work, encompassing the unique style, technique, and expression that make a piece of art distinctive and impactful. Therefore, the artistry of the painting has its ability to convey complex ideas and emotions. It better reflects the social function than the authenticity of the painting. Social function and the authenticity of a painting give people identity and belonging. But, however, as an audience, the accuracy of a painting only tells me the knowledge of history. It does not connect me with the painter emotionally. There is no communication happening and certainly no impact for us. Take the picture of Washington crossing the Delaware as an example. Despite the same historical significance, the Louiswis painting created in 1851 in Germany was inspired by the revolutionary spirit and aimed to encourage the democratic movement in Europe. The image of Washington standing resolutely at the bow of the boat, surrounded by a diverse group of soldiers, serves as a powerful symbol of leadership and unity. The light in the painting symbolizes hope, and the small boat reflects the current of determination. Its emotional resonance has made it an important part of American culture. It has become an integral part of American cultural heritage, produced in countless texts, exhibited in metropolitan museums of art. It has helped to define the narratives of American independence and has become a symbol of national pride. This cultural significance underlines its social function as an underlying force that unites individuals to events and shared values. While a painting may be more historically accurate in terms of setting and details, it lacks the same level of symbolic power and emotional impact. Though its emotional impact and cultural significance messages continue to resonate, providing that art can be a catalyst for change and for culture.
以下为ai总结(感谢来自 刘圣韬 学长的精彩ai prompt!基座大模型为豆包。)
绘画的社会功能是否能够通过其在深层次的情感层面上与人交流和联系,并促进文化认同来体现,以及是否具有独特的风格、技巧和表达来使作品具有影响力,以此判断绘画的艺术性是否比其真实性更能反映社会功能。
绘画的艺术性因其能够传达复杂思想和情感、产生情感共鸣并具有文化意义,比绘画的真实性更能反映其社会功能。
That's OK. So, for the negative speaker one, I heard that the art is for the feeling that one feels from the art. But let me see the root of the problem. Like, art is attractive, but if it is not supported by authority, it is just a mirage. For example, some surreal or abstract paintings and complete departure from the real elements of the road reference as a difficulty for the audience. One's deep presence and understanding of art is often based on their own life experience, and this experience is derived from the real world. Also, paintings that are authentic have the power to preserve. Paintings that are authentic have the power to preserve. For example, "General Napoleon Crossing the Alps" by Paul Delaroche accurately shows how things were in the past. Unlike "Napoleon Crossing the Alps" by Jacques-Louis David, where Napoleon rides a rearing horse, Paul Delaroche's painting focuses more on expression, authenticity, and painting. "Napoleon Crossing the Alps" by Paul Delaroche is more consistent with historical facts as it is recorded. Consistent with historical facts as it is recorded that the hills were so steep that it was difficult for the horses to cross the mountains, and actually, a donkey or more rather than a horse was used. This realistic reproduction of the scene and the amount allows the audience to understand more objectively the historical events of Napoleon's crossing. When it comes to inspiring people to see the real and raw truth in painting, considering emotions in a profound way makes us face the reality of human experience, whether good or bad, and motivates us to make a difference. Authenticity in painting is a foundation upon which social understanding and progress are built. Our opponents may claim that our history is of little importance, but without authenticity, art can become misleading. Our history without a basis in truth may create beautiful but hollow images. Authentic painting gives us the real context, which is essential for the social function of education. And at the same time, it makes the core message strong and reliable. And finally, in conclusion, authenticity in painting is what enables it to fulfill its social function and to communicate the truth of our past and inspire us by showing us the real. We should always value the authenticity of paintings as they are the keys to unlocking the social significance. Thank you.
That's OK. So, for the negative speaker one, I heard that the art is for the feeling that one feels from the art. But let me see the root of the problem. Like, art is attractive, but if it is not supported by authority, it is just a mirage. For example, some surreal or abstract paintings and complete departure from the real elements of the road reference as a difficulty for the audience. One's deep presence and understanding of art is often based on their own life experience, and this experience is derived from the real world. Also, paintings that are authentic have the power to preserve. Paintings that are authentic have the power to preserve. For example, "General Napoleon Crossing the Alps" by Paul Delaroche accurately shows how things were in the past. Unlike "Napoleon Crossing the Alps" by Jacques-Louis David, where Napoleon rides a rearing horse, Paul Delaroche's painting focuses more on expression, authenticity, and painting. "Napoleon Crossing the Alps" by Paul Delaroche is more consistent with historical facts as it is recorded. Consistent with historical facts as it is recorded that the hills were so steep that it was difficult for the horses to cross the mountains, and actually, a donkey or more rather than a horse was used. This realistic reproduction of the scene and the amount allows the audience to understand more objectively the historical events of Napoleon's crossing. When it comes to inspiring people to see the real and raw truth in painting, considering emotions in a profound way makes us face the reality of human experience, whether good or bad, and motivates us to make a difference. Authenticity in painting is a foundation upon which social understanding and progress are built. Our opponents may claim that our history is of little importance, but without authenticity, art can become misleading. Our history without a basis in truth may create beautiful but hollow images. Authentic painting gives us the real context, which is essential for the social function of education. And at the same time, it makes the core message strong and reliable. And finally, in conclusion, authenticity in painting is what enables it to fulfill its social function and to communicate the truth of our past and inspire us by showing us the real. We should always value the authenticity of paintings as they are the keys to unlocking the social significance. Thank you.
以下为ai总结(感谢来自 刘圣韬 学长的精彩ai prompt!基座大模型为豆包。)
真实性在绘画中至关重要,它使绘画能够实现其社会功能,传达我们过去的真相,并通过展示真实来激励我们。我们应该始终重视绘画的真实性,因为它们是解锁社会意义的关键。
OK, welcome back. Next, we have the following. While authenticity plays a role in historical representation, it is artistry that truly enhances our understanding and appreciation of figures like Napoleon. Artistic presentation goes beyond mere factual accuracy, providing a deeper emotional and intellectual connection to the subject. Artistic expression captures the essence of the character of a figure, allowing us to engage with the complexities of Napoleon's character and the era in which he lived. Through techniques such as color, composition, and symbolism, it conveys not just what happened but the feelings and ideas behind those events. This emotional resonance can often communicate aspects of human experience that dry historical facts cannot.
Authenticity ensures that the core message of a painting is rooted in factual accuracy, but without artistry. In essence, while authenticity provides the baseline of truth, it is artistry that breathes life into historical representation. By prioritizing artistry, we allow ourselves to experience the depth of Napoleon's legacy, fostering a connection that is both educational and emotionally impactful. Art history is what forms a historical figure into an icon, enabling us to relate to and learn from the past in a meaningful way instead of just knowing the facts.
First, let's consider the value of authenticity in historical representation. Authentic pieces, whether they are paintings or artifacts, offer a direct connection to the past. They allow us to understand not just who Napoleon was but also the historical context from which he operated. Authenticity reveals the nuances of his character, his ambitions, and the social and political landscape of Europe during his time. This provides a solid framework for interpreting his actions and consequences. While the case for artistry in the paintings of Napoleon has been made.
Okay, so to understand the power of our history, let's consider the role of the artist and storyteller. Artists like Jacques-Louis David, as you mentioned, did not merely document Napoleon; he crafted narratives that highlighted his larger-than-life persona. Works like "Napoleon Crossing the Alps" capture not just the moment in history but transform Napoleon into a heroic figure. The dramatic composition, the swirling clouds, and the powerful stance of Napoleon all serve to elevate him beyond the ordinary, portraying him as a symbol of strength and ambition. This artistic choice resonates deeply with viewers, allowing them to connect with the figure of Napoleon on an emotional level. This allows the expression of complex human emotions like happiness and other emotions through the color, form, and compositions that raw historical data often cannot. Thank you.
OK, welcome back. Next, we have the following. While authenticity plays a role in historical representation, it is artistry that truly enhances our understanding and appreciation of figures like Napoleon. Artistic presentation goes beyond mere factual accuracy, providing a deeper emotional and intellectual connection to the subject. Artistic expression captures the essence of the character of a figure, allowing us to engage with the complexities of Napoleon's character and the era in which he lived. Through techniques such as color, composition, and symbolism, it conveys not just what happened but the feelings and ideas behind those events. This emotional resonance can often communicate aspects of human experience that dry historical facts cannot.
Authenticity ensures that the core message of a painting is rooted in factual accuracy, but without artistry. In essence, while authenticity provides the baseline of truth, it is artistry that breathes life into historical representation. By prioritizing artistry, we allow ourselves to experience the depth of Napoleon's legacy, fostering a connection that is both educational and emotionally impactful. Art history is what forms a historical figure into an icon, enabling us to relate to and learn from the past in a meaningful way instead of just knowing the facts.
First, let's consider the value of authenticity in historical representation. Authentic pieces, whether they are paintings or artifacts, offer a direct connection to the past. They allow us to understand not just who Napoleon was but also the historical context from which he operated. Authenticity reveals the nuances of his character, his ambitions, and the social and political landscape of Europe during his time. This provides a solid framework for interpreting his actions and consequences. While the case for artistry in the paintings of Napoleon has been made.
Okay, so to understand the power of our history, let's consider the role of the artist and storyteller. Artists like Jacques-Louis David, as you mentioned, did not merely document Napoleon; he crafted narratives that highlighted his larger-than-life persona. Works like "Napoleon Crossing the Alps" capture not just the moment in history but transform Napoleon into a heroic figure. The dramatic composition, the swirling clouds, and the powerful stance of Napoleon all serve to elevate him beyond the ordinary, portraying him as a symbol of strength and ambition. This artistic choice resonates deeply with viewers, allowing them to connect with the figure of Napoleon on an emotional level. This allows the expression of complex human emotions like happiness and other emotions through the color, form, and compositions that raw historical data often cannot. Thank you.
以下为ai总结(感谢来自 刘圣韬 学长的精彩ai prompt!基座大模型为豆包。)
通过强调艺术性,我们能够更好地理解和欣赏像拿破仑这样的历史人物,以有意义的方式与过去建立联系并从中学习,使历史人物成为具有教育意义和情感影响力的象征。
Three.01.3。我可以开始了。我看到有人卡,没听到相关内容,所以只能自己再说一遍,不然确实听不太清楚。
正方观点,我认为有以下几点。第一,历史、文化的保存与传承。像绘画这类艺术品,它们保存了我们过去的文化记忆,为我们提供了一个了解过去社会的独特视角,这是任何复制品都无法替代的。绘画作为历史文献的一种,它们是那个时代政治、家庭和文化模式的证据。其次,艺术市场中的信任、兴趣以及绘画的价值。艺术市场是以实用性和流通性为基础的,这表明收藏家、博物馆和公众并非只关注其经济价值,绘画的价值不仅体现在金钱方面,还具有重要的社会意义。再者,法律和道德层面的考量。真正的绘画作品也受到国内法律和条约的约束,这些法律和条约旨在保护文化遗产,防止非法交易。绘画作为法律和道德考量的对象,其社会功能在于确保艺术家和作品来源地社区的权利得到尊重。
以上便是我们探讨的关于绘画在社会中真实性和注册性之间复杂关系的几个方面。绘画的社会功能至关重要,它是艺术市场中绘画作为历史文献的价值以及在法律和道德框架内受到尊重的基石。因此,绘画的社会功能确保了其作为历史文献的价值在艺术市场中得以保持,并在法律和道德框架内受到尊重。谢谢,现在有一分钟准备时间。
Three.01.3。我可以开始了。我看到有人卡,没听到相关内容,所以只能自己再说一遍,不然确实听不太清楚。
正方观点,我认为有以下几点。第一,历史、文化的保存与传承。像绘画这类艺术品,它们保存了我们过去的文化记忆,为我们提供了一个了解过去社会的独特视角,这是任何复制品都无法替代的。绘画作为历史文献的一种,它们是那个时代政治、家庭和文化模式的证据。其次,艺术市场中的信任、兴趣以及绘画的价值。艺术市场是以实用性和流通性为基础的,这表明收藏家、博物馆和公众并非只关注其经济价值,绘画的价值不仅体现在金钱方面,还具有重要的社会意义。再者,法律和道德层面的考量。真正的绘画作品也受到国内法律和条约的约束,这些法律和条约旨在保护文化遗产,防止非法交易。绘画作为法律和道德考量的对象,其社会功能在于确保艺术家和作品来源地社区的权利得到尊重。
以上便是我们探讨的关于绘画在社会中真实性和注册性之间复杂关系的几个方面。绘画的社会功能至关重要,它是艺术市场中绘画作为历史文献的价值以及在法律和道德框架内受到尊重的基石。因此,绘画的社会功能确保了其作为历史文献的价值在艺术市场中得以保持,并在法律和道德框架内受到尊重。谢谢,现在有一分钟准备时间。
以下为ai总结(感谢来自 刘圣韬 学长的精彩ai prompt!基座大模型为豆包。)
绘画的社会功能至关重要,它确保了其作为历史文献的价值在艺术市场中得以保持,并在法律和道德框架内受到尊重。
这段话里最精彩的三句话:
Of my time starts now. Some artists that change their focusing off the most certain ideas were the ones that captured bravery or historical feels and aspire people with strong emotions. However, the few limit the border of purpose support also is not just in promoting ideas and sharing complex inside echoes, go or passages, or the course of emotion. Firstly, you may have a historical figure where again she limits sexes, but the paying trying too hard to justify someone or something risks providing and we all important detail practice. And taking that focus on three or promotion to over us more later view. Learning a see story and way which with multiple means. For example, in avenues Washington cutting down work is a EUR for the avenue washingtonroping down work. If EUR for the painting parks after only from celebrating Washington were truly make the work memorable, it is the and emotional depth which invites us to think our resilience. Slow fund in a way that your personality is relevant. The art in the work encourages what be young generation for Russia and engages us in a border reflection. And more over, you are many in the way emotions where teach we we do a risk help of it. Power culture all upon integration. Our true strength is its ability to invite different responses. Those delivering a single message and opinioning that is. 'Books on a specific agenda can allow complex ideas and emotions that help us to come back with the work in our own meaningful ways. This flexibility allows us to speak to people from different cultures and times. This flexibility allows us to speak to people from different cultures and times and giving the social roles that goes beyond without education or fish. Where is this? We look at the out by they is not just the po way. Way engage us girls. Artistic choices they made course in can we and dramatic composition. And because smooth power off and position and determination in this are three brains of the work life in the way that allows us to replace. And regardless whether we see the po. And lastly, taking the art has no purpose of to lack of PRO emotional message overlooks how our connects with people's who beauty still as involved will render. Highlight certain emotions are invited to state and to respond in personal ways are the exercise creativity from great passages. The black social impact. On the contrary, promote both deep fresh apology views. Kind engagement can be as any and to reflect on thisities of history. The nation we are are think simply of age. We develop better on the and appreciation and lack and conclusion. While art includes out today can certainly highlight your license and smart view as how to celebrate to create true understanding and meaningful connection. Limited compared to or balances operation quite allowing for diverse perspectives. Our strict stresses in a painting social and educational block in encourager. But and dialogue. The real power of arts life is not only to deliver a single message but in is ability to as far as look people exp history demanding and the experiences that we all share. Exp history and experiences that we all share. So this what this art as lacking impact. This hour to promote reflection, bring people together cross time and to what it means to be human. Thank you.
Of my time starts now. Some artists that change their focusing off the most certain ideas were the ones that captured bravery or historical feels and aspire people with strong emotions. However, the few limit the border of purpose support also is not just in promoting ideas and sharing complex inside echoes, go or passages, or the course of emotion. Firstly, you may have a historical figure where again she limits sexes, but the paying trying too hard to justify someone or something risks providing and we all important detail practice. And taking that focus on three or promotion to over us more later view. Learning a see story and way which with multiple means. For example, in avenues Washington cutting down work is a EUR for the avenue washingtonroping down work. If EUR for the painting parks after only from celebrating Washington were truly make the work memorable, it is the and emotional depth which invites us to think our resilience. Slow fund in a way that your personality is relevant. The art in the work encourages what be young generation for Russia and engages us in a border reflection. And more over, you are many in the way emotions where teach we we do a risk help of it. Power culture all upon integration. Our true strength is its ability to invite different responses. Those delivering a single message and opinioning that is. 'Books on a specific agenda can allow complex ideas and emotions that help us to come back with the work in our own meaningful ways. This flexibility allows us to speak to people from different cultures and times. This flexibility allows us to speak to people from different cultures and times and giving the social roles that goes beyond without education or fish. Where is this? We look at the out by they is not just the po way. Way engage us girls. Artistic choices they made course in can we and dramatic composition. And because smooth power off and position and determination in this are three brains of the work life in the way that allows us to replace. And regardless whether we see the po. And lastly, taking the art has no purpose of to lack of PRO emotional message overlooks how our connects with people's who beauty still as involved will render. Highlight certain emotions are invited to state and to respond in personal ways are the exercise creativity from great passages. The black social impact. On the contrary, promote both deep fresh apology views. Kind engagement can be as any and to reflect on thisities of history. The nation we are are think simply of age. We develop better on the and appreciation and lack and conclusion. While art includes out today can certainly highlight your license and smart view as how to celebrate to create true understanding and meaningful connection. Limited compared to or balances operation quite allowing for diverse perspectives. Our strict stresses in a painting social and educational block in encourager. But and dialogue. The real power of arts life is not only to deliver a single message but in is ability to as far as look people exp history demanding and the experiences that we all share. Exp history and experiences that we all share. So this what this art as lacking impact. This hour to promote reflection, bring people together cross time and to what it means to be human. Thank you.
以下为ai总结(感谢来自 刘圣韬 学长的精彩ai prompt!基座大模型为豆包。)
艺术的真正力量在于其多义性、灵活性,能够促进深刻思考和反思,引发个人的情感回应和创造力的发挥,而不仅仅是传递单一的信息。
Thank you. So now, each team has ninety minutes to prepare for the feedback. And you guys decide who is going to speak for the team, okay? And after nineteen seconds, the negative side will go first.
Thank you. So now, each team has ninety minutes to prepare for the feedback. And you guys decide who is going to speak for the team, okay? And after nineteen seconds, the negative side will go first.
以下为ai总结(感谢来自 刘圣韬 学长的精彩ai prompt!基座大模型为豆包。)
团队需要在九十分钟内完成反馈准备工作,并确定发言代表,以满足判断标准,实现有效反馈。
And it is over. Now, who is going to speak to provide feedback for affirmities? Ah, OK, I'll do that. OK, so, uh, first, thank you for presenting your views on the role of authenticity in arts. You made strong points about how authenticity helps preserve art and cultural contents and has valuable insights into our understanding of specific moments or figures. However, I think that relying too much on authenticity can sometimes overlook the emotional and, uh, while obviously, the significance of painting in art history. Also, the two trends of creating connections across cultures and generations have a social impact. And creating connections among cultures and generations in our social impact is the strongest link. The creativity advice CS pressures that in interurf expectations and inquiring conversationmation that reach far beyond our culture. Thank you.
And it is over. Now, who is going to speak to provide feedback for affirmities? Ah, OK, I'll do that. OK, so, uh, first, thank you for presenting your views on the role of authenticity in arts. You made strong points about how authenticity helps preserve art and cultural contents and has valuable insights into our understanding of specific moments or figures. However, I think that relying too much on authenticity can sometimes overlook the emotional and, uh, while obviously, the significance of painting in art history. Also, the two trends of creating connections across cultures and generations have a social impact. And creating connections among cultures and generations in our social impact is the strongest link. The creativity advice CS pressures that in interurf expectations and inquiring conversationmation that reach far beyond our culture. Thank you.
以下为ai总结(感谢来自 刘圣韬 学长的精彩ai prompt!基座大模型为豆包。)
Okay, if you have an extra thirty minutes next time, please speak more. Now, who is speaking from the affirmative? Okay, I'm going. OK. So, thank you for every received. And I think for the other team, they gave some very strong agreements and very specific examples. I know you very well. Okay, so next time, maybe a little bit more helpful tips.
Okay, if you have an extra thirty minutes next time, please speak more. Now, who is speaking from the affirmative? Okay, I'm going. OK. So, thank you for every received. And I think for the other team, they gave some very strong agreements and very specific examples. I know you very well. Okay, so next time, maybe a little bit more helpful tips.
以下为ai总结(感谢来自 刘圣韬 学长的精彩ai prompt!基座大模型为豆包。)
未明确得出结论。
以下为本段话中的金句:
Yes now okay thank you everyone for your wonderful speech and I know the Internet is not reporting very well and I hope I really hope next time we can do this face to face now let's work on our judge.And DR and Miss melody and who who of the best for good your'welcome concern search wish啊,OKOK啊,Hello everyone hello OK so um firstly ii think all of you uh now has focus on our issue and you really prepared uh with the evidence uh which are the four artworks ah we prepare the for artworks uh we prepared um and all you know first uh for your advantage I think you all use the details like him um if mentioned is uniform um my kidss mentioned is the spreading clas and also givebber mentioned is the challenges of crossing the mountain ah that's really good use of the evidence you have interpreted find it some important details and secondly you all focus on explaining a a point and considering a uh considering the issue in the real world um but for for something we can improve is a firstly please pay attention to why your evidence can support your argument um like.Firstly um.It between a Du uh but personally uh matias mentioned uh only the symbolic uh elements can inspire the feeling of our audience of the leaders but you please when you use the uh details you need to explain why the spreading clothes why um uh he look uh expression can uh give us an emotional feelings so so try to interpret your evidence and link it with your opinioner uh that's not a only a a a problem for for one students but most of you if you have mentioned the detail you you please a link it with your opiniononeer a giveber did it really good and the secondly um I have a question uh do you have any a pre discussion and do you have any pre discussion before our debate so so so I mean have you ever share your opinion with your teammates.Hello hello, OK maybe maybe you can you can tell me later OK really OK.Because I I find that there is a lack of Co cooper between your and your teammates for example between you can giveilbert due to regarding to the details of the painting and Gilbert mentioned the personal feelings and the importance of real life experience in understanding the art and how how can this details related to the core message mentioned by Duke about the paintings accurate the reflection so so I think you can have some.Accurate the reflection so so I think you can have some discussionion ah and you can uh do the debate us a better because our uh our listeners can understand your logic step by step uh that would be better and the last thing is I think um now we are not that strong in um re battleals and we cannot give our ah ah we we cannot give each other very effective constructive feedbacks so I think um maybe ah after Chris you can give us more feedbacks about how how to have an initiative feedback and how to improve our ability in in giving constructive feedback bags and that's my comment okay that's it.I'm curious if to is let uh the score or know ah ii tried but um maybe uh after next Wednesday when we have face face of this discussion ah I I can have a more accurate understanding of it ah I did it but um um maybe it's not uh um maybe it's not a very authentic feedback so I need to discuss with you and then then I know how how can do better okay is it okay yeah yes sure sure sure I ask in the group in the which group yeah if the boys want to want to be scored noone answered the me okay.Okay that's great okay so like okay firstly everything that melody said is actually things that I had written down so she's done a magnet on the job of explaining particularly the question of evidence I'LL go back for it in a moment many of these points of extremely important and first thing is feedback when you're given them feedback what you're supposed to do is not to emry not to reititeate the argument not to arguing it that's not purpose of feedback the about of feedback is to talk about the strength of your opponent what they did that was strong what they did that was compelling what they did that you felt check mated you that you felt was difficult for you to answer but also what you felt was weak about their position.Yes so you're looking at the strength and weaknesses that's the purpose of feedback.Yes so you're looking at the strengths and weaknesses that's the purpose of feedback so you're helping to make them so stronger because you're not always going to be on different teams you're sometimes going to be on same team and helping us helping all of us to debate better is in all of our interests that's the idea that's what we're doing the feedback yes and it's to help us all so we don't go back over the argument what we do is we say actually look know what you said was very very strong when you talking about cultural identity it was very very good that was very good the arey shaping cultural identity then it doesn't need that the authentic does it that's a very good argument yeah and maybe there piece of evidence that you use was excellent that type that's the thing that you're looking for when you talk about feedback and just quickly I thought the debate was much much better much better thought the debate was much much better much better than last week and because you engaged with the issue much more system as if you think about some of the language that came out of this discussion cult identity developing an icon.Bill talked about and mil art we talked about time capsules talked about that art as the time capsule that's a really interesting did foundation for progress as well a very interesting idea is idea and turning a taking a historical figure turning them into a symbol not into historically authentic character but into a symbol this is part of the purpose of art and this is really interested because there's then the council arguments we have the social function of in education the social function our being as an being predict document.The social function of our team as an incquied documentation these are clearly contradictory positions and they clearly illustrate the problem in the discussion so you did really really well with that I thought I was an excellent very good indeed and I mean I did this ideal craft in narrative of'what I was magnexcent prices craft in narratives and then I mean there others as well I mean feelilbert you you in the tois were the single the single greatte sentenceive is beautiful but hollow which are forced magnificent of what was a lovely sector that's probablyly way to put it and anyway going on from that this was what was very very good the witnessness the key weakness that I see there were two witnesses the first is please read your papers before you speak okay this is particularly direct to that matcht yes who was given completely the wrong argument and you were given wrong.To that matcht who was given completely the wrong argument and you were given the wrong the argument for authenticity against art historyry and then realized what you would doing offer for a change your position that will not look at okay so make sure you read your paper purpose make sure you have a very it's very clear and if necessary'change its okay if you'got it from um check gd wherever that's fine but check it please check it I check it carefully before you speak the second point is if you're using words like moreuthenticity.Oru fnticity please make sure you can pronounce them if you can't pronounce them don't use them use realism realism means the same thing okay so use a different work if you can't pronounce word don't find user change it okay use something that you'are comfortable we do not use words that you'are not comfortable with figure it on understand equally if you're using French words like.'not comfortable take it on on understand equally if you're using French wordss like ah Jack Louis doubled Jack Jack that's the French okay not jackers Jack okay it's like wait if you try to speak if you try to use Chinese planes and you don't understand Chinese you get more manled I mean that doesn't very good okay so you need to you need to think about things that that check those sort of things those sort of detail very important okay they convey your credibility as a speaker in your credibility is an agu okay and the other thing that I withjow about talk is precisely what melody talk which is evidence how do you use evidence and so here's the problem the reason my melody mentioned do you discuss your arguments beforehand is because you should have three arguments three points.Beforehan is because you should have three arguments three points three arguments you are going to make one speak was going to make one argument the second speak going to make the second argument third speakersers going to make third argument each parliament needs to be divided between the free spliners so the three of you some campus be behaviorve the my colleaguegs and the three of you need to work out who's going to argue what and then you focus on how the evidence support your argument and what the evidence says that is if that can demonstrate your so you take one point argument you explain that point and then you explain the re of the evidence.Our would is relevantate you august now we did much much better with this much much better last week you actually managed to do a lot of that but because you were trying to bring it multiple arguments so for instance the the.Ask because you were trying to bring in multiple arguments so for instance de being brought in my three new arguments in what should be coming four minutes and that's not that's impossible you're not going to be able to do that and't provide evidence to pack them up you're just not going to be able to do that you are just going to look weak because of it because you haven't supported the re evidenceance from shock the rele of the evidence so that's what you need to think much more is breaking down what the argument is into three pieces so that one one comes one speaker speak one thing one speak speecher one speaker speak got the second thing in the third ET cetera and then you have more time to have in evidence and explain frombit that's the idea that's what we look before much more and that will give you pretty much um much more powerful position equally in the bottle in the bottle the bottle in the bottle the the bottle should speak to something that you understand immediately that you can counter that you can argue against and immediately from what the previous speaker said and now if you don't see them a bottle then ignore it and go straight to what you want to say if you feel to a bottle is going to diverge going to push your away from the key argument then ignore it and the carryve on but the purposes of a bottle is soda if something is if something in your argument can immediately destroy your comments argument then you should use it you should try it that and so there are two really important things the first is the the first major one is wellld done much much pros the second one is plan your arguments plan or arguments plan the evidence how do.Plan your argument plan your argument plan the evidence how the evidence links to each other voice the development of the evidence each time spend most of your contribution explaining the relevance of your evidence okay but that's the key thing I think for the future but well done much much much better really happy with.Thankyou uh uh maybe.
Yes now okay thank you everyone for your wonderful speech and I know the Internet is not reporting very well and I hope I really hope next time we can do this face to face now let's work on our judge.And DR and Miss melody and who who of the best for good your'welcome concern search wish啊,OKOK啊,Hello everyone hello OK so um firstly ii think all of you uh now has focus on our issue and you really prepared uh with the evidence uh which are the four artworks ah we prepare the for artworks uh we prepared um and all you know first uh for your advantage I think you all use the details like him um if mentioned is uniform um my kidss mentioned is the spreading clas and also givebber mentioned is the challenges of crossing the mountain ah that's really good use of the evidence you have interpreted find it some important details and secondly you all focus on explaining a a point and considering a uh considering the issue in the real world um but for for something we can improve is a firstly please pay attention to why your evidence can support your argument um like.Firstly um.It between a Du uh but personally uh matias mentioned uh only the symbolic uh elements can inspire the feeling of our audience of the leaders but you please when you use the uh details you need to explain why the spreading clothes why um uh he look uh expression can uh give us an emotional feelings so so try to interpret your evidence and link it with your opinioner uh that's not a only a a a problem for for one students but most of you if you have mentioned the detail you you please a link it with your opiniononeer a giveber did it really good and the secondly um I have a question uh do you have any a pre discussion and do you have any pre discussion before our debate so so so I mean have you ever share your opinion with your teammates.Hello hello, OK maybe maybe you can you can tell me later OK really OK.Because I I find that there is a lack of Co cooper between your and your teammates for example between you can giveilbert due to regarding to the details of the painting and Gilbert mentioned the personal feelings and the importance of real life experience in understanding the art and how how can this details related to the core message mentioned by Duke about the paintings accurate the reflection so so I think you can have some.Accurate the reflection so so I think you can have some discussionion ah and you can uh do the debate us a better because our uh our listeners can understand your logic step by step uh that would be better and the last thing is I think um now we are not that strong in um re battleals and we cannot give our ah ah we we cannot give each other very effective constructive feedbacks so I think um maybe ah after Chris you can give us more feedbacks about how how to have an initiative feedback and how to improve our ability in in giving constructive feedback bags and that's my comment okay that's it.I'm curious if to is let uh the score or know ah ii tried but um maybe uh after next Wednesday when we have face face of this discussion ah I I can have a more accurate understanding of it ah I did it but um um maybe it's not uh um maybe it's not a very authentic feedback so I need to discuss with you and then then I know how how can do better okay is it okay yeah yes sure sure sure I ask in the group in the which group yeah if the boys want to want to be scored noone answered the me okay.Okay that's great okay so like okay firstly everything that melody said is actually things that I had written down so she's done a magnet on the job of explaining particularly the question of evidence I'LL go back for it in a moment many of these points of extremely important and first thing is feedback when you're given them feedback what you're supposed to do is not to emry not to reititeate the argument not to arguing it that's not purpose of feedback the about of feedback is to talk about the strength of your opponent what they did that was strong what they did that was compelling what they did that you felt check mated you that you felt was difficult for you to answer but also what you felt was weak about their position.Yes so you're looking at the strength and weaknesses that's the purpose of feedback.Yes so you're looking at the strengths and weaknesses that's the purpose of feedback so you're helping to make them so stronger because you're not always going to be on different teams you're sometimes going to be on same team and helping us helping all of us to debate better is in all of our interests that's the idea that's what we're doing the feedback yes and it's to help us all so we don't go back over the argument what we do is we say actually look know what you said was very very strong when you talking about cultural identity it was very very good that was very good the arey shaping cultural identity then it doesn't need that the authentic does it that's a very good argument yeah and maybe there piece of evidence that you use was excellent that type that's the thing that you're looking for when you talk about feedback and just quickly I thought the debate was much much better much better thought the debate was much much better much better than last week and because you engaged with the issue much more system as if you think about some of the language that came out of this discussion cult identity developing an icon.Bill talked about and mil art we talked about time capsules talked about that art as the time capsule that's a really interesting did foundation for progress as well a very interesting idea is idea and turning a taking a historical figure turning them into a symbol not into historically authentic character but into a symbol this is part of the purpose of art and this is really interested because there's then the council arguments we have the social function of in education the social function our being as an being predict document.The social function of our team as an incquied documentation these are clearly contradictory positions and they clearly illustrate the problem in the discussion so you did really really well with that I thought I was an excellent very good indeed and I mean I did this ideal craft in narrative of'what I was magnexcent prices craft in narratives and then I mean there others as well I mean feelilbert you you in the tois were the single the single greatte sentenceive is beautiful but hollow which are forced magnificent of what was a lovely sector that's probablyly way to put it and anyway going on from that this was what was very very good the witnessness the key weakness that I see there were two witnesses the first is please read your papers before you speak okay this is particularly direct to that matcht yes who was given completely the wrong argument and you were given wrong.To that matcht who was given completely the wrong argument and you were given the wrong the argument for authenticity against art historyry and then realized what you would doing offer for a change your position that will not look at okay so make sure you read your paper purpose make sure you have a very it's very clear and if necessary'change its okay if you'got it from um check gd wherever that's fine but check it please check it I check it carefully before you speak the second point is if you're using words like moreuthenticity.Oru fnticity please make sure you can pronounce them if you can't pronounce them don't use them use realism realism means the same thing okay so use a different work if you can't pronounce word don't find user change it okay use something that you'are comfortable we do not use words that you'are not comfortable with figure it on understand equally if you're using French words like.'not comfortable take it on on understand equally if you're using French wordss like ah Jack Louis doubled Jack Jack that's the French okay not jackers Jack okay it's like wait if you try to speak if you try to use Chinese planes and you don't understand Chinese you get more manled I mean that doesn't very good okay so you need to you need to think about things that that check those sort of things those sort of detail very important okay they convey your credibility as a speaker in your credibility is an agu okay and the other thing that I withjow about talk is precisely what melody talk which is evidence how do you use evidence and so here's the problem the reason my melody mentioned do you discuss your arguments beforehand is because you should have three arguments three points.Beforehan is because you should have three arguments three points three arguments you are going to make one speak was going to make one argument the second speak going to make the second argument third speakersers going to make third argument each parliament needs to be divided between the free spliners so the three of you some campus be behaviorve the my colleaguegs and the three of you need to work out who's going to argue what and then you focus on how the evidence support your argument and what the evidence says that is if that can demonstrate your so you take one point argument you explain that point and then you explain the re of the evidence.Our would is relevantate you august now we did much much better with this much much better last week you actually managed to do a lot of that but because you were trying to bring it multiple arguments so for instance the the.Ask because you were trying to bring in multiple arguments so for instance de being brought in my three new arguments in what should be coming four minutes and that's not that's impossible you're not going to be able to do that and't provide evidence to pack them up you're just not going to be able to do that you are just going to look weak because of it because you haven't supported the re evidenceance from shock the rele of the evidence so that's what you need to think much more is breaking down what the argument is into three pieces so that one one comes one speaker speak one thing one speak speecher one speaker speak got the second thing in the third ET cetera and then you have more time to have in evidence and explain frombit that's the idea that's what we look before much more and that will give you pretty much um much more powerful position equally in the bottle in the bottle the bottle in the bottle the the bottle should speak to something that you understand immediately that you can counter that you can argue against and immediately from what the previous speaker said and now if you don't see them a bottle then ignore it and go straight to what you want to say if you feel to a bottle is going to diverge going to push your away from the key argument then ignore it and the carryve on but the purposes of a bottle is soda if something is if something in your argument can immediately destroy your comments argument then you should use it you should try it that and so there are two really important things the first is the the first major one is wellld done much much pros the second one is plan your arguments plan or arguments plan the evidence how do.Plan your argument plan your argument plan the evidence how the evidence links to each other voice the development of the evidence each time spend most of your contribution explaining the relevance of your evidence okay but that's the key thing I think for the future but well done much much much better really happy with.Thankyou uh uh maybe.
That Chris and Miss Malority will talk about this. If the voice you want to know which team is the winning team. If you don't want to know again, we don't know. Okay, if you want to know, maybe we can. And last next, okay. Um, all right. Thank you. Thank you everyone to join this debate. DR Chris made that point about you really need to organize and prepare as a team before this. Next time, if you really don't have time to prepare well, then we don't do this because it's time-consuming and everyone needs to make time for this. Correct. Anyone wants to say any reflections? To OK now. How about the uh, you just text your answer if you want uh.
That Chris and Miss Malority will talk about this. If the voice you want to know which team is the winning team. If you don't want to know again, we don't know. Okay, if you want to know, maybe we can. And last next, okay. Um, all right. Thank you. Thank you everyone to join this debate. DR Chris made that point about you really need to organize and prepare as a team before this. Next time, if you really don't have time to prepare well, then we don't do this because it's time-consuming and everyone needs to make time for this. Correct. Anyone wants to say any reflections? To OK now. How about the uh, you just text your answer if you want uh.
以下为ai总结(感谢来自 刘圣韬 学长的精彩ai prompt!基座大模型为豆包。)
团队在参加辩论时,应该充分重视组织和准备工作,并确保有足够的时间来进行准备,以提高辩论的质量和效果。