Now we'll have negative one to speak. Please be clear when you start to click the time. Time, you know. Now, our position is that the most important social function of the painting is its ability to communicate and connect with people on a deep emotional level and foster cultural identification. The artistry refers to the skilled creativity and imagination that artists bring to their work, encompassing the unique style, technique, and expression that make a piece of art distinctive and impactful. Therefore, the artistry of the painting has its ability to convey complex ideas and emotions. It better reflects the social function than the authenticity of the painting. Social function and the authenticity of a painting give people identity and belonging. But, however, as an audience, the accuracy of a painting only tells me the knowledge of history. It does not connect me with the painter emotionally. There is no communication happening and certainly no impact for us. Take the picture of Washington crossing the Delaware as an example. Despite the same historical significance, the Louiswis painting created in 1851 in Germany was inspired by the revolutionary spirit and aimed to encourage the democratic movement in Europe. The image of Washington standing resolutely at the bow of the boat, surrounded by a diverse group of soldiers, serves as a powerful symbol of leadership and unity. The light in the painting symbolizes hope, and the small boat reflects the current of determination. Its emotional resonance has made it an important part of American culture. It has become an integral part of American cultural heritage, produced in countless texts, exhibited in metropolitan museums of art. It has helped to define the narratives of American independence and has become a symbol of national pride. This cultural significance underlines its social function as an underlying force that unites individuals to events and shared values. While a painting may be more historically accurate in terms of setting and details, it lacks the same level of symbolic power and emotional impact. Though its emotional impact and cultural significance messages continue to resonate, providing that art can be a catalyst for change and for culture.

　　That's OK. So, for the negative speaker one, I heard that the art is for the feeling that one feels from the art. But let me see the root of the problem. Like, art is attractive, but if it is not supported by authority, it is just a mirage. For example, some surreal or abstract paintings and complete departure from the real elements of the road reference as a difficulty for the audience. One's deep presence and understanding of art is often based on their own life experience, and this experience is derived from the real world. Also, paintings that are authentic have the power to preserve. Paintings that are authentic have the power to preserve. For example, "General Napoleon Crossing the Alps" by Paul Delaroche accurately shows how things were in the past. Unlike "Napoleon Crossing the Alps" by Jacques-Louis David, where Napoleon rides a rearing horse, Paul Delaroche's painting focuses more on expression, authenticity, and painting. "Napoleon Crossing the Alps" by Paul Delaroche is more consistent with historical facts as it is recorded. Consistent with historical facts as it is recorded that the hills were so steep that it was difficult for the horses to cross the mountains, and actually, a donkey or more rather than a horse was used. This realistic reproduction of the scene and the amount allows the audience to understand more objectively the historical events of Napoleon's crossing. When it comes to inspiring people to see the real and raw truth in painting, considering emotions in a profound way makes us face the reality of human experience, whether good or bad, and motivates us to make a difference. Authenticity in painting is a foundation upon which social understanding and progress are built. Our opponents may claim that our history is of little importance, but without authenticity, art can become misleading. Our history without a basis in truth may create beautiful but hollow images. Authentic painting gives us the real context, which is essential for the social function of education. And at the same time, it makes the core message strong and reliable. And finally, in conclusion, authenticity in painting is what enables it to fulfill its social function and to communicate the truth of our past and inspire us by showing us the real. We should always value the authenticity of paintings as they are the keys to unlocking the social significance. Thank you.

　　OK, welcome back. Next, we have the following. While authenticity plays a role in historical representation, it is artistry that truly enhances our understanding and appreciation of figures like Napoleon. Artistic presentation goes beyond mere factual accuracy, providing a deeper emotional and intellectual connection to the subject. Artistic expression captures the essence of the character of a figure, allowing us to engage with the complexities of Napoleon's character and the era in which he lived. Through techniques such as color, composition, and symbolism, it conveys not just what happened but the feelings and ideas behind those events. This emotional resonance can often communicate aspects of human experience that dry historical facts cannot.

　　Authenticity ensures that the core message of a painting is rooted in factual accuracy, but without artistry. In essence, while authenticity provides the baseline of truth, it is artistry that breathes life into historical representation. By prioritizing artistry, we allow ourselves to experience the depth of Napoleon's legacy, fostering a connection that is both educational and emotionally impactful. Art history is what forms a historical figure into an icon, enabling us to relate to and learn from the past in a meaningful way instead of just knowing the facts.

　　First, let's consider the value of authenticity in historical representation. Authentic pieces, whether they are paintings or artifacts, offer a direct connection to the past. They allow us to understand not just who Napoleon was but also the historical context from which he operated. Authenticity reveals the nuances of his character, his ambitions, and the social and political landscape of Europe during his time. This provides a solid framework for interpreting his actions and consequences. While the case for artistry in the paintings of Napoleon has been made.

　　Okay, so to understand the power of our history, let's consider the role of the artist and storyteller. Artists like Jacques-Louis David, as you mentioned, did not merely document Napoleon; he crafted narratives that highlighted his larger-than-life persona. Works like "Napoleon Crossing the Alps" capture not just the moment in history but transform Napoleon into a heroic figure. The dramatic composition, the swirling clouds, and the powerful stance of Napoleon all serve to elevate him beyond the ordinary, portraying him as a symbol of strength and ambition. This artistic choice resonates deeply with viewers, allowing them to connect with the figure of Napoleon on an emotional level. This allows the expression of complex human emotions like happiness and other emotions through the color, form, and compositions that raw historical data often cannot. Thank you.

　　Three.01.3。我可以开始了。我看到有人卡，没听到相关内容，所以只能自己再说一遍，不然确实听不太清楚。

　　正方观点，我认为有以下几点。第一，历史、文化的保存与传承。像绘画这类艺术品，它们保存了我们过去的文化记忆，为我们提供了一个了解过去社会的独特视角，这是任何复制品都无法替代的。绘画作为历史文献的一种，它们是那个时代政治、家庭和文化模式的证据。其次，艺术市场中的信任、兴趣以及绘画的价值。艺术市场是以实用性和流通性为基础的，这表明收藏家、博物馆和公众并非只关注其经济价值，绘画的价值不仅体现在金钱方面，还具有重要的社会意义。再者，法律和道德层面的考量。真正的绘画作品也受到国内法律和条约的约束，这些法律和条约旨在保护文化遗产，防止非法交易。绘画作为法律和道德考量的对象，其社会功能在于确保艺术家和作品来源地社区的权利得到尊重。

　　以上便是我们探讨的关于绘画在社会中真实性和注册性之间复杂关系的几个方面。绘画的社会功能至关重要，它是艺术市场中绘画作为历史文献的价值以及在法律和道德框架内受到尊重的基石。因此，绘画的社会功能确保了其作为历史文献的价值在艺术市场中得以保持，并在法律和道德框架内受到尊重。谢谢，现在有一分钟准备时间。

　　Of my time starts now. Some artists that change their focusing off the most certain ideas were the ones that captured bravery or historical feels and aspire people with strong emotions. However, the few limit the border of purpose support also is not just in promoting ideas and sharing complex inside echoes, go or passages, or the course of emotion. Firstly, you may have a historical figure where again she limits sexes, but the paying trying too hard to justify someone or something risks providing and we all important detail practice. And taking that focus on three or promotion to over us more later view. Learning a see story and way which with multiple means. For example, in avenues Washington cutting down work is a EUR for the avenue washingtonroping down work. If EUR for the painting parks after only from celebrating Washington were truly make the work memorable, it is the and emotional depth which invites us to think our resilience. Slow fund in a way that your personality is relevant. The art in the work encourages what be young generation for Russia and engages us in a border reflection. And more over, you are many in the way emotions where teach we we do a risk help of it. Power culture all upon integration. Our true strength is its ability to invite different responses. Those delivering a single message and opinioning that is. 'Books on a specific agenda can allow complex ideas and emotions that help us to come back with the work in our own meaningful ways. This flexibility allows us to speak to people from different cultures and times. This flexibility allows us to speak to people from different cultures and times and giving the social roles that goes beyond without education or fish. Where is this? We look at the out by they is not just the po way. Way engage us girls. Artistic choices they made course in can we and dramatic composition. And because smooth power off and position and determination in this are three brains of the work life in the way that allows us to replace. And regardless whether we see the po. And lastly, taking the art has no purpose of to lack of PRO emotional message overlooks how our connects with people's who beauty still as involved will render. Highlight certain emotions are invited to state and to respond in personal ways are the exercise creativity from great passages. The black social impact. On the contrary, promote both deep fresh apology views. Kind engagement can be as any and to reflect on thisities of history. The nation we are are think simply of age. We develop better on the and appreciation and lack and conclusion. While art includes out today can certainly highlight your license and smart view as how to celebrate to create true understanding and meaningful connection. Limited compared to or balances operation quite allowing for diverse perspectives. Our strict stresses in a painting social and educational block in encourager. But and dialogue. The real power of arts life is not only to deliver a single message but in is ability to as far as look people exp history demanding and the experiences that we all share. Exp history and experiences that we all share. So this what this art as lacking impact. This hour to promote reflection, bring people together cross time and to what it means to be human. Thank you.

　　Thank you. So now, each team has ninety minutes to prepare for the feedback. And you guys decide who is going to speak for the team, okay? And after nineteen seconds, the negative side will go first.

　　And it is over. Now, who is going to speak to provide feedback for affirmities? Ah, OK, I'll do that. OK, so, uh, first, thank you for presenting your views on the role of authenticity in arts. You made strong points about how authenticity helps preserve art and cultural contents and has valuable insights into our understanding of specific moments or figures. However, I think that relying too much on authenticity can sometimes overlook the emotional and, uh, while obviously, the significance of painting in art history. Also, the two trends of creating connections across cultures and generations have a social impact. And creating connections among cultures and generations in our social impact is the strongest link. The creativity advice CS pressures that in interurf expectations and inquiring conversationmation that reach far beyond our culture. Thank you.

　　Okay, if you have an extra thirty minutes next time, please speak more. Now, who is speaking from the affirmative? Okay, I'm going. OK. So, thank you for every received. And I think for the other team, they gave some very strong agreements and very specific examples. I know you very well. Okay, so next time, maybe a little bit more helpful tips.

　　Yes. Now, okay. Thank you everyone for your wonderful speech. I know the Internet connection was not very stable, and I sincerely hope that next time we can have this discussion face - to - face.

　　Now, let's turn to our judges, Dr. and Miss Melody.

　　Hello everyone. Firstly, I think all of you have focused on our issue and prepared well with evidence. The four artworks we prepared were used effectively. You all made good use of details. For example, someone mentioned the uniform, some kids mentioned the spreading cloth, and Gibber mentioned the challenges of crossing the mountain. That's really good use of evidence. You have interpreted and found some important details.

　　Secondly, you all focused on explaining a point and considering the issue in the real - world context. However, there are some areas for improvement. Firstly, please pay attention to how your evidence can support your argument. For instance, Matias mentioned that only symbolic elements can inspire the feelings of the audience and leaders. But when using details, you need to explain why the spreading cloth or the expression can evoke emotional feelings. Try to interpret your evidence and link it with your opinion. This is not a problem for just one student but for most of you. Gibber did it really well in this regard.

　　Secondly, I have a question. Did you have any pre - discussion before our debate? Maybe you can tell me later. I noticed a lack of cooperation between teammates. For example, regarding the details of the painting, Gibber mentioned personal feelings and the importance of real - life experience in understanding art, while Duke mentioned the accurate reflection of the painting. You should have some discussions so that our listeners can understand your logic step by step, which would make the debate better.

　　The last thing is that currently, we are not very strong in rebuttals, and we cannot give each other very effective constructive feedback. Maybe after Chris, you can give us more feedback on how to provide initiative feedback and improve our ability in giving constructive feedback. That's my comment.

　　I'm curious about the scores. I've tried, but maybe after next Wednesday's face - to - face discussion, I can have a more accurate understanding. My current feedback might not be very authentic, so I need to discuss with you to know how to do better. I asked in the group if the boys wanted to be scored, but no one answered.

　　Okay. Everything that Melody said is actually what I had written down. She did an excellent job of explaining, particularly the question of evidence. I'll come back to it in a moment. Many of these points are extremely important.

　　First, let's talk about feedback. When you're given feedback, the purpose is not to reiterate the argument or argue. The purpose of feedback is to discuss the strengths and weaknesses of your opponent. You should point out what they did well, what was compelling, and what you found difficult to answer, as well as what you thought was weak about their position. By doing so, you're helping to make them stronger because you're not always going to be on different teams. Helping all of us to debate better is in all of our interests.

　　For example, you can say, "What you said about cultural identity was very strong. The way you shaped the argument about cultural identity was excellent. And the piece of evidence you used was also great." That's what you should look for when giving feedback.

　　I thought the debate was much better than last week. You engaged with the issue more systematically. Some interesting ideas came out of this discussion, such as the development of cultural identity, art as a time - capsule, and turning a historical figure into a symbol. These are really interesting concepts, and the contradictory positions between the social function of art in education and art as a documentation clearly illustrate the problem in the discussion. You did really well with that.

　　Gilbert, you had a great sentence, "The single greatest sentence is beautiful but hollow." It was a magnificent way to put it.

　　However, there were two key weaknesses. Firstly, please read your papers before you speak. This is especially directed at Matias, who was given the wrong argument about authenticity against art history and then changed the position during the debate. Make sure you read your paper carefully, and if necessary, make changes. Check it thoroughly before you speak.

　　Secondly, if you're using words like "authenticity" and you can't pronounce them, don't use them. Use a synonym like "realism" instead. Similarly, if you're using French words like "Jacques - Louis David", make sure you pronounce them correctly. Using words you're not comfortable with can damage your credibility as a speaker.

　　Another important point, as Melody mentioned, is about evidence. You should have three arguments in advance. Each speaker should be responsible for one argument. The three of you need to work out who will argue what and then focus on how the evidence supports your argument. You should break down the argument into three parts so that each speaker can explain one part and have more time to present and explain the evidence.

　　In the rebuttal, if something in the previous speaker's argument can immediately counter your comment, use it. But if you think a rebuttal will push you away from the key argument, ignore it and continue with your own point.

　　Overall, well - done. There has been much progress. In the future, plan your arguments, plan the evidence, and spend most of your contribution explaining the relevance of your evidence. I'm really happy with your performance.

　　Thank you. Maybe...

　　That Chris and Miss Malority will talk about this. If the voice you want to know which team is the winning team. If you don't want to know again, we don't know. Okay, if you want to know, maybe we can. And last next, okay. Um, all right. Thank you. Thank you everyone to join this debate. DR Chris made that point about you really need to organize and prepare as a team before this. Next time, if you really don't have time to prepare well, then we don't do this because it's time-consuming and everyone needs to make time for this. Correct. Anyone wants to say any reflections? To OK now. How about the uh, you just text your answer if you want uh.