阅读量:0
OK OK,好,我看一下最后,应该是OK的,Ready,我们开始了啊。
Not only a tool for communicating, it actually carries the local culture and history of the place. The things we lose when a language disappears are not only the words or pronunciation of that language. We actually lose cultures, local elements like memories, histories, even folk songs or jokes, and we will also lose the unique way of seeing the world.
We will also lose the unique perspective in the world. As you can see, the Qinjian dialect in China, and now there are only about 5% of its speakers left, that's why.
OK OK,好,我看一下最后,应该是OK的,Ready,我们开始了啊。
Not only a tool for communicating, it actually carries the local culture and history of the place. The things we lose when a language disappears are not only the words or pronunciation of that language. We actually lose cultures, local elements like memories, histories, even folk songs or jokes, and we will also lose the unique way of seeing the world.
We will also lose the unique perspective in the world. As you can see, the Qinjian dialect in China, and now there are only about 5% of its speakers left, that's why.
以下为ai总结(感谢来自 刘圣韬 学长的精彩ai prompt!基座大模型为豆包。)
首先指出语言不仅是交流工具,还承载着地方文化和历史;接着阐述语言消失时失去的不仅是词汇和发音,还包括文化、记忆、历史、民歌、笑话等地方元素以及独特的世界观和视角;最后以中国琴江方言仅存约5%使用者为例进行说明。
Well, I think preserving languages is important. I partially agree with that, but we must also consider that creating languages is a natural process. Language itself is also a natural phenomenon, and this is a natural process that the world has presented to us.
We should allow languages to disappear and new languages to be created equally. Even if fewer people speak a certain language, or one of the languages is disappearing, this is part of a natural process. We should not stop it, and we should let it happen.
If we were to spend money to preserve languages, it would not be particularly useful for our daily lives either.
Well, I think preserving languages is important. I partially agree with that, but we must also consider that creating languages is a natural process. Language itself is also a natural phenomenon, and this is a natural process that the world has presented to us.
We should allow languages to disappear and new languages to be created equally. Even if fewer people speak a certain language, or one of the languages is disappearing, this is part of a natural process. We should not stop it, and we should let it happen.
If we were to spend money to preserve languages, it would not be particularly useful for our daily lives either.
以下为ai总结(感谢来自 刘圣韬 学长的精彩ai prompt!基座大模型为豆包。)
First, the argument is about language disappearance occurring across the globe. This relates to how we define nature: people abandon their native language for various reasons, such as colonialism, or even policies that forbid people from speaking their mother tongue.
As an example, the Hebrew language was once on the brink of extinction, but it has now been revived. Experts spent 43 years reviving it, so reviving a lost language will cost far more than simply protecting a language that is still alive and thriving.
First, the argument is about language disappearance occurring across the globe. This relates to how we define nature: people abandon their native language for various reasons, such as colonialism, or even policies that forbid people from speaking their mother tongue.
As an example, the Hebrew language was once on the brink of extinction, but it has now been revived. Experts spent 43 years reviving it, so reviving a lost language will cost far more than simply protecting a language that is still alive and thriving.
以下为ai总结(感谢来自 刘圣韬 学长的精彩ai prompt!基座大模型为豆包。)
Okay well yeah, I surely agree that protecting language. I don't protect the culture, but I don't think that still explains why we should protect the language, even though I think protecting the language is sometimes important to preserve the culture.
I think it's definitely part of the natural process. Even if we wanted to save languages or not, we can definitely argue that how much effort we put into saving a language goes into whether this is the language we're saving, or is the history we're saving.
Even if the history is important, I think, I think language disappearing and appearing is a natural process, and we can't deny that when we say that using efforts is important, using costs, and even tent—plus we are using costs to basically preserve it, which is possibly slowing down our national society right now.
Okay well yeah, I surely agree that protecting language. I don't protect the culture, but I don't think that still explains why we should protect the language, even though I think protecting the language is sometimes important to preserve the culture.
I think it's definitely part of the natural process. Even if we wanted to save languages or not, we can definitely argue that how much effort we put into saving a language goes into whether this is the language we're saving, or is the history we're saving.
Even if the history is important, I think, I think language disappearing and appearing is a natural process, and we can't deny that when we say that using efforts is important, using costs, and even tent—plus we are using costs to basically preserve it, which is possibly slowing down our national society right now.
以下为ai总结(感谢来自 刘圣韬 学长的精彩ai prompt!基座大模型为豆包。)
(注:由于仅提供反方一辩质询正方一辩的辩论文本,缺少正方一辩的陈述内容,以下为基于反方质询内容的逻辑推导与反驳路径分析)
(注:完整对话流程图需基于正方一辩的原始陈述及反方针对性质询展开,此处因信息不全,仅呈现反方质询的内部逻辑链条)
So, we still strongly believe that we should save all those alive languages because in our process, we must consider all relevant reasons, except the natural ones mentioned.
Also, the way of protecting these languages does not mean that we should go against the progress of the world or global development. This is about, for example, the many developing processes that help ease the human diversity brought by other languages, as well as the cultural identities and differences brought by other relevant knowledge which we are about to inherit.
So, we still strongly believe that we should save all those alive languages because in our process, we must consider all relevant reasons, except the natural ones mentioned.
Also, the way of protecting these languages does not mean that we should go against the progress of the world or global development. This is about, for example, the many developing processes that help ease the human diversity brought by other languages, as well as the cultural identities and differences brought by other relevant knowledge which we are about to inherit.
以下为ai总结(感谢来自 刘圣韬 学长的精彩ai prompt!基座大模型为豆包。)
I agree with what you said. For example, not hoarding money would definitely not harm society. However, I still believe that the disappearance of languages is a natural process. We should allow languages to disappear naturally, rather than intervene in a way that goes against the natural laws of how things develop. I think society would benefit more if we do not preserve languages that are no longer widely used.
大家可以再思考一下。
I think this is because they...
I agree with what you said. For example, not hoarding money would definitely not harm society. However, I still believe that the disappearance of languages is a natural process. We should allow languages to disappear naturally, rather than intervene in a way that goes against the natural laws of how things develop. I think society would benefit more if we do not preserve languages that are no longer widely used.
大家可以再思考一下。
I think this is because they...
以下为ai总结(感谢来自 刘圣韬 学长的精彩ai prompt!基座大模型为豆包。)