我们的《辩论百科》功能已经上线啦！
例如，《在恋爱关系中，应该追求等价的付出·在恋爱关系中，不应该追求等价的付出》一题，辩之竹内共收录26场比赛。我们为您提供这26场比赛的论点、判断标准提取，以及总计数百条论据的提取，还有Deepseek的辩题分析。这可以帮您更好备赛。
欢迎您点击下方按钮，前往查看。
[AI生成]Smartphones are necessary for students[AI生成]Smartphones are not necessary for students
sophieishow辩论2025年08月19日阅读量：0
aizen
阅读量：0
智能手机对学生而言是必要的。首先，当遇到紧急情况，比如生病或遗忘物品时，可以用手机联系父母。此外，还可以使用智能手机进行在线学习，这对大学生来说是合理的。
有人认为必需品就像俄罗斯人必须有汽车一样，但学生的首要任务是学习和成长，没有智能手机他们也能继续前行。然而，智能手机带来的风险对学生来说可能难以避免，这点我无法保证。
其实他说完之后，你就不能再说了。好的，不能说了，因为再说就犯规了。
智能手机对学生而言是必要的。首先，当遇到紧急情况，比如生病或遗忘物品时，可以用手机联系父母。此外，还可以使用智能手机进行在线学习，这对大学生来说是合理的。
有人认为必需品就像俄罗斯人必须有汽车一样，但学生的首要任务是学习和成长，没有智能手机他们也能继续前行。然而，智能手机带来的风险对学生来说可能难以避免，这点我无法保证。
其实他说完之后，你就不能再说了。好的，不能说了，因为再说就犯规了。
以下为ai总结(感谢来自 刘圣韬 学长的精彩ai prompt！基座大模型为豆包。)
（如果是其他陈词环节）论述流程
- 正方一辩首先提出观点"智能手机对学生而言是必要的"，并给出两个理由：一是紧急情况下可联系父母，二是大学生可用于在线学习。
- 反方一辩未直接提出明确观点，而是先反驳了将必需品类比为"俄罗斯人必须有汽车"的说法，认为学生首要任务是学习和成长，没有智能手机也能继续前行，随后指出智能手机带来的风险对学生可能难以避免。
- 最后出现与辩论内容无关的关于规则的表述："其实他说完之后，你就不能再说了。好的，不能说了，因为再说就犯规了。"
The most important reason is that you can connect your parents if you might encounter some serious situations like forgetting something important or getting sick. Do you agree with that?
No, I don't worry about that because if you want to communicate with your parents, you can also use an old phone. For other relationships, we can communicate through other means. So why is a smartphone necessary?
Because we can use smartphones to study online. You know educational resources are not fair. Students in poor areas can't access excellent teachers, so they must use smartphones to study online and get excellent educational resources. What do you think of it?
It might be a little help, but the knowledge from classes and teachers is enough. You can also use books in libraries, and that can replace smartphones.
The problem is that they are too poor to get good educational resources. They are too poor to have excellent teachers and classmates. As you said, they can study in libraries, but what if they don't have libraries? So they must have resources like smartphones and computers to get online resources.
All right, but is it necessary? Your idea seems to suggest that smartphones can be replaced by other tools, but you can also search for information with teachers. However, if the teachers are not very good, it's not helpful for study.
Smartphones are necessary because nothing can replace them. Can teachers replace smartphones? No, because teachers alone are not enough to teach students in poor areas. Education in some areas is not fair, so they must have this tool to access better study resources and secure a better future.
All your points mention books can help students, but you are avoiding the reality of students' needs.
But consider things like video games and interesting videos on platforms. Don't you find many young people get distracted by those? If the question is about necessity, and they get attracted by video games, we can stress management.
The most important reason is that you can connect your parents if you might encounter some serious situations like forgetting something important or getting sick. Do you agree with that?
No, I don't worry about that because if you want to communicate with your parents, you can also use an old phone. For other relationships, we can communicate through other means. So why is a smartphone necessary?
Because we can use smartphones to study online. You know educational resources are not fair. Students in poor areas can't access excellent teachers, so they must use smartphones to study online and get excellent educational resources. What do you think of it?
It might be a little help, but the knowledge from classes and teachers is enough. You can also use books in libraries, and that can replace smartphones.
The problem is that they are too poor to get good educational resources. They are too poor to have excellent teachers and classmates. As you said, they can study in libraries, but what if they don't have libraries? So they must have resources like smartphones and computers to get online resources.
All right, but is it necessary? Your idea seems to suggest that smartphones can be replaced by other tools, but you can also search for information with teachers. However, if the teachers are not very good, it's not helpful for study.
Smartphones are necessary because nothing can replace them. Can teachers replace smartphones? No, because teachers alone are not enough to teach students in poor areas. Education in some areas is not fair, so they must have this tool to access better study resources and secure a better future.
All your points mention books can help students, but you are avoiding the reality of students' needs.
But consider things like video games and interesting videos on platforms. Don't you find many young people get distracted by those? If the question is about necessity, and they get attracted by video games, we can stress management.
以下为ai总结(感谢来自 刘圣韬 学长的精彩ai prompt！基座大模型为豆包。)
（如果是质询环节）对话流程
- 正方首轮进攻：提出紧急情况联系父母的必要性→（诉诸需求）
- 反方防御反击：用老人机替代方案⊣正方必要性主张→提出"为何智能手机是必需"的质询（归谬法）
- 正方次轮进攻：转向教育资源公平性，指出贫困地区学生需智能手机获取优质资源→（诉诸因果）
- 反方防御反击：主张课堂知识+图书馆资源已足够⊣正方教育必要性→（替代方案论证）
- 正方强化进攻：指出贫困地区缺乏图书馆等基础设施，智能手机成为唯一途径→（补充前提反驳）
- 反方弱化防御：承认教师质量问题，但质疑智能手机的不可替代性→（模糊化论证）
- 正方核心立论：强调智能手机的不可替代性，教师无法单独解决教育不公问题→（强化因果链）
- 反方转向新战场：提出智能手机的娱乐诱惑导致分心问题→（引入新变量）
- 正方防御处理：承认分心问题，但主张可通过管理解决→（削弱对方论点）
